Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAn Idea to Increase the Security of EAP-MD5 Protocol Against Dictionary Attack
56
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Behrooz Khadem
Publication date
2018
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
IEEE 802.1X is an international standard for Port-based Network Access Control which provides authentication for devices applicant of either local network or wireless local network. This standard defines the packing of EAP protocol on IEEE 802. In this standard, authentication protocols become a complementary part of network security. There is a variety in EAP family protocols, regarding their speed and security. One of the fastest of these protocols is EAP-MD5 which is the main subject of this paper. Moreover, in order to improve EAP-MD5 security, a series of attacks against it have been investigated. In this paper at first EAP-MD5 protocol is introduced briefly and a series of the dictionary attacks against it are described. Then, based on observed weaknesses, by proposing an appropriate idea while maintaining the speed of execution, its security against dictionary attack is improved.
rate research
Read More
Cryptographic protocols are often specified by narrations, i.e., finite sequences of message exchanges that show the intended execution of the protocol. Another use of narrations is to describe attacks. We propose in this paper to compile, when possible, attack describing narrations into a set of tests that honest participants can perform to exclude these executions. These tests can be implemented in monitors to protect existing implementations from rogue behaviour.
Background: Over the year, Machine Learning Phishing URL classification (MLPU) systems have gained tremendous popularity to detect phishing URLs proactively. Despite this vogue, the security vulnerabilities of MLPUs remain mostly unknown. Aim: To address this concern, we conduct a study to understand the test time security vulnerabilities of the state-of-the-art MLPU systems, aiming at providing guidelines for the future development of these systems. Method: In this paper, we propose an evasion attack framework against MLPU systems. To achieve this, we first develop an algorithm to generate adversarial phishing URLs. We then reproduce 41 MLPU systems and record their baseline performance. Finally, we simulate an evasion attack to evaluate these MLPU systems against our generated adversarial URLs. Results: In comparison to previous works, our attack is: (i) effective as it evades all the models with an average success rate of 66% and 85% for famous (such as Netflix, Google) and less popular phishing targets (e.g., Wish, JBHIFI, Officeworks) respectively; (ii) realistic as it requires only 23ms to produce a new adversarial URL variant that is available for registration with a median cost of only $11.99/year. We also found that popular online services such as Google SafeBrowsing and VirusTotal are unable to detect these URLs. (iii) We find that Adversarial training (successful defence against evasion attack) does not significantly improve the robustness of these systems as it decreases the success rate of our attack by only 6% on average for all the models. (iv) Further, we identify the security vulnerabilities of the considered MLPU systems. Our findings lead to promising directions for future research. Conclusion: Our study not only illustrate vulnerabilities in MLPU systems but also highlights implications for future study towards assessing and improving these systems.
Android unlock patterns remain quite common. Our study, as well as others, finds that roughly 25% of respondents use a pattern when unlocking their phone. Despite known security issues, the design of the pattern interface remains unchanged since first launch. We propose Double Patterns, a natural and easily adoptable advancement on Android unlock patterns that maintains the core design features, but instead of selecting a single pattern, a user selects two, concurrent Android unlock patterns entered one-after-the-other super-imposed on the same 3x3 grid. We evaluated Double Patterns for both security and usability by conducting an online study with $n=634$ participants in three treatments: a control treatment, a first pattern entry blocklist, and a blocklist for both patterns. We find that in all settings, user chosen Double Patterns are more secure than traditional patterns based on standard guessability metrics, more similar to that of 4-/6-digit PINs, and even more difficult to guess for a simulated attacker. Users express positive sentiments in qualitative feedback, particularly those who currently (or previously) used Android unlock patterns, and overall, participants found the Double Pattern interface quite usable, with high recall retention and comparable entry times to traditional patterns. In particular, current Android pattern users, the target population for Double Patterns, reported SUS scores in the 80th percentile and high perceptions of security and usability in responses to open- and closed-questions. Based on these findings, we would recommend adding Double Patterns as an advancement to Android patterns, much like allowing for added PIN length.
Speaker verification has been widely and successfully adopted in many mission-critical areas for user identification. The training of speaker verification requires a large amount of data, therefore users usually need to adopt third-party data ($e.g.$, data from the Internet or third-party data company). This raises the question of whether adopting untrusted third-party data can pose a security threat. In this paper, we demonstrate that it is possible to inject the hidden backdoor for infecting speaker verification models by poisoning the training data. Specifically, we design a clustering-based attack scheme where poisoned samples from different clusters will contain different triggers ($i.e.$, pre-defined utterances), based on our understanding of verification tasks. The infected models behave normally on benign samples, while attacker-specified unenrolled triggers will successfully pass the verification even if the attacker has no information about the enrolled speaker. We also demonstrate that existing backdoor attacks cannot be directly adopted in attacking speaker verification. Our approach not only provides a new perspective for designing novel attacks, but also serves as a strong baseline for improving the robustness of verification methods. The code for reproducing main results is available at url{https://github.com/zhaitongqing233/Backdoor-attack-against-speaker-verification}.
NEO is one of the top public chains worldwide. We focus on its backbone consensus protocol, called delegated Byzantine Fault Tolerance (dBFT). The dBFT protocol has been adopted by a variety of blockchain systems such as ONT. dBFT claims to guarantee the security when no more than $f = lfloor frac{n}{3} rfloor$ nodes are Byzantine, where $n$ is the total number of consensus participants. However, we identify attacks to break the claimed security. In this paper, we show our results by providing a security analysis on its dBFT protocol. First, we evaluate NEOs source code and formally present the procedures of dBFT via the state machine replication (SMR) model. Next, we provide a theoretical analysis with two example attacks. These attacks break the security of dBFT with no more than $f$ nodes. Then, we provide recommendations on how to fix the system against the identified attacks. The suggested fixes have been accepted by the NEO official team. Finally, we further discuss the reasons causing such issues, the relationship with current permissioned blockchain systems, and the scope of potential influence.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
