Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAn Evasion Attack against ML-based Phishing URL Detectors
238
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Bushra Sabir
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
Bushra Sabir
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Background: Over the year, Machine Learning Phishing URL classification (MLPU) systems have gained tremendous popularity to detect phishing URLs proactively. Despite this vogue, the security vulnerabilities of MLPUs remain mostly unknown. Aim: To address this concern, we conduct a study to understand the test time security vulnerabilities of the state-of-the-art MLPU systems, aiming at providing guidelines for the future development of these systems. Method: In this paper, we propose an evasion attack framework against MLPU systems. To achieve this, we first develop an algorithm to generate adversarial phishing URLs. We then reproduce 41 MLPU systems and record their baseline performance. Finally, we simulate an evasion attack to evaluate these MLPU systems against our generated adversarial URLs. Results: In comparison to previous works, our attack is: (i) effective as it evades all the models with an average success rate of 66% and 85% for famous (such as Netflix, Google) and less popular phishing targets (e.g., Wish, JBHIFI, Officeworks) respectively; (ii) realistic as it requires only 23ms to produce a new adversarial URL variant that is available for registration with a median cost of only $11.99/year. We also found that popular online services such as Google SafeBrowsing and VirusTotal are unable to detect these URLs. (iii) We find that Adversarial training (successful defence against evasion attack) does not significantly improve the robustness of these systems as it decreases the success rate of our attack by only 6% on average for all the models. (iv) Further, we identify the security vulnerabilities of the considered MLPU systems. Our findings lead to promising directions for future research. Conclusion: Our study not only illustrate vulnerabilities in MLPU systems but also highlights implications for future study towards assessing and improving these systems.
rate research
Read More
Machine learning (ML) based approaches have been the mainstream solution for anti-phishing detection. When they are deployed on the client-side, ML-based classifiers are vulnerable to evasion attacks. However, such potential threats have received relatively little attention because existing attacks destruct the functionalities or appearance of webpages and are conducted in the white-box scenario, making it less practical. Consequently, it becomes imperative to understand whether it is possible to launch evasion attacks with limited knowledge of the classifier, while preserving the functionalities and appearance. In this work, we show that even in the grey-, and black-box scenarios, evasion attacks are not only effective on practical ML-based classifiers, but can also be efficiently launched without destructing the functionalities and appearance. For this purpose, we propose three mutation-based attacks, differing in the knowledge of the target classifier, addressing a key technical challenge: automatically crafting an adversarial sample from a known phishing website in a way that can mislead classifiers. To launch attacks in the white- and grey-box scenarios, we also propose a sample-based collision attack to gain the knowledge of the target classifier. We demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our evasion attacks on the state-of-the-art, Googles phishing page filter, achieved 100% attack success rate in less than one second per website. Moreover, the transferability attack on BitDefenders industrial phishing page classifier, TrafficLight, achieved up to 81.25% attack success rate. We further propose a similarity-based method to mitigate such evasion attacks, Pelican. We demonstrate that Pelican can effectively detect evasion attacks. Our findings contribute to design more robust phishing website classifiers in practice.
Machine learning (ML) classifiers are vulnerable to adversarial examples. An adversarial example is an input sample which is slightly modified to induce misclassification in an ML classifier. In this work, we investigate white-box and grey-box evasion attacks to an ML-based malware detector and conduct performance evaluations in a real-world setting. We compare the defense approaches in mitigating the attacks. We propose a framework for deploying grey-box and black-box attacks to malware detection systems.
Machine learning-based systems for malware detection operate in a hostile environment. Consequently, adversaries will also target the learning system and use evasion attacks to bypass the detection of malware. In this paper, we outline our learning-based system PEberus that got the first place in the defender challenge of the Microsoft Evasion Competition, resisting a variety of attacks from independent attackers. Our system combines multiple, diverse defenses: we address the semantic gap, use various classification models, and apply a stateful defense. This competition gives us the unique opportunity to examine evasion attacks under a realistic scenario. It also highlights that existing machine learning methods can be hardened against attacks by thoroughly analyzing the attack surface and implementing concepts from adversarial learning. Our defense can serve as an additional baseline in the future to strengthen the research on secure learning.
Speaker verification has been widely and successfully adopted in many mission-critical areas for user identification. The training of speaker verification requires a large amount of data, therefore users usually need to adopt third-party data ($e.g.$, data from the Internet or third-party data company). This raises the question of whether adopting untrusted third-party data can pose a security threat. In this paper, we demonstrate that it is possible to inject the hidden backdoor for infecting speaker verification models by poisoning the training data. Specifically, we design a clustering-based attack scheme where poisoned samples from different clusters will contain different triggers ($i.e.$, pre-defined utterances), based on our understanding of verification tasks. The infected models behave normally on benign samples, while attacker-specified unenrolled triggers will successfully pass the verification even if the attacker has no information about the enrolled speaker. We also demonstrate that existing backdoor attacks cannot be directly adopted in attacking speaker verification. Our approach not only provides a new perspective for designing novel attacks, but also serves as a strong baseline for improving the robustness of verification methods. The code for reproducing main results is available at url{https://github.com/zhaitongqing233/Backdoor-attack-against-speaker-verification}.
Phishing is one of the most severe cyber-attacks where researchers are interested to find a solution. In phishing, attackers lure end-users and steal their personal in-formation. To minimize the damage caused by phishing must be detected as early as possible. There are various phishing attacks like spear phishing, whaling, vishing, smishing, pharming and so on. There are various phishing detection techniques based on white-list, black-list, content-based, URL-based, visual-similarity and machine-learning. In this paper, we discuss various kinds of phishing attacks, attack vectors and detection techniques for detecting the phishing sites. Performance comparison of 18 different models along with nine different sources of datasets are given. Challenges in phishing detection techniques are also given.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
