No Arabic abstract
M. B. Levin used Sobol-Faure low discrepancy sequences with Pascal matrices modulo $2$ to construct, for each integer $b$, a real number $x$ such that the first $N$ terms of the sequence $(b^n x mod 1)_{ngeq 1}$ have discrepancy $O((log N)^2/N)$. This is the lowest discrepancy known for this kind of sequences. In this note we characterize Levins construction in terms of nested perfect necklaces, which are a variant of the classical de Bruijn necklaces. Moreover, we show that every real number $x$ whose base $b$ expansion is the concatenation of nested perfect necklaces of exponentially increasing order satisfies that the first $N$ terms of $(b^n x mod 1)_{ngeq 1}$ have discrepancy $O((log N)^2/N)$. For base $2$ and the order being a power of $2$, we give the exact number of nested perfect necklaces and an explicit method based on matrices to construct each of them.
One of the many number theoretic topics investigated by the ancient Greeks was perfect numbers, which are positive integers equal to the sum of their proper positive integral divisors. Mathematicians from Euclid to Euler investigated these mysterious numbers. We present results on perfect numbers in the ring of Eisenstein integers.
Let s be an integer greater than or equal to 2. A real number is simply normal to base s if in its base-s expansion every digit 0, 1, ..., s-1 occurs with the same frequency 1/s. Let X be the set of positive integers that are not perfect powers, hence X is the set {2,3, 5,6,7,10,11,...} . Let M be a function from X to sets of positive integers such that, for each s in X, if m is in M(s) then each divisor of m is in M(s) and if M(s) is infinite then it is equal to the set of all positive integers. These conditions on M are necessary for there to be a real number which is simply normal to exactly the bases s^m such that s is in X and m is in M(s). We show these conditions are also sufficient and further establish that the set of real numbers that satisfy them has full Hausdorff dimension. This extends a result of W. M. Schmidt (1961/1962) on normal numbers to different bases.
A perfect number is a positive integer n such that n equals the sum of all positive integer divisors of n that are less than n. That is, although n is a divisor of n, n is excluded from this sum. Thus 6 = 1 + 2 + 3 is perfect, but 12 < 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 is not perfect. An ACL2 theory of perfect numbers is developed and used to prove, in ACL2(r), this bit of mathematical folklore: Even if there are infinitely many perfect numbers the series of the reciprocals of all perfect numbers converges.
Let $alpha=0.a_1a_2a_3ldots$ be an irrational number in base $b>1$, where $0leq a_i<b$. The number $alpha in (0,1)$ is a $textit{normal number}$ if every block $(a_{n+1}a_{n+2}ldots a_{n+k})$ of $k$ digits occurs with probability $1/b^k$. A conditional proof of the normality of the real number $pi$ in base $10$ is presented in this note.
Generalizing the concept of a perfect number is a Zumkeller or integer perfect number that was introduced by Zumkeller in 2003. The positive integer $n$ is a Zumkeller number if its divisors can be partitioned into two sets with the same sum, which will be $sigma(n)/2$. Generalizing even further, we call $n$ a $k$-layered number if its divisors can be partitioned into $k$ sets with equal sum. In this paper, we completely characterize Zumkeller numbers with two distinct prime factors and give some bounds for prime factorization in case of Zumkeller numbers with more than two distinct prime factors. We also characterize $k$-layered numbers with two distinct prime factors and even $k$-layered numbers with more than two distinct odd prime factors. Some other results concerning these numbers and their relationship with practical numbers and Harmonic mean numbers are also discussed.