Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models
79
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Guanhua Fang
Publication date
2017
fields
Mathematical Statistics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This paper establishes fundamental results for statistical inference of diagnostic classification models (DCM). The results are developed at a high level of generality, applicable to essentially all diagnostic classification models. In particular, we establish identifiability results of various modeling parameters, notably item response probabilities, attribute distribution, and Q-matrix-induced partial information structure. Consistent estimators are constructed. Simulation results show that these estimators perform well under various modeling settings. We also use a real example to illustrate the new method. The results are stated under the setting of general latent class models. For DCM with a specific parameterization, the conditions may be adapted accordingly.
rate research
Read More
Gaussian process regression (GPR) model is a popular nonparametric regression model. In GPR, features of the regression function such as varying degrees of smoothness and periodicities are modeled through combining various covarinace kernels, which are supposed to model certain effects. The covariance kernels have unknown parameters which are estimated by the EM-algorithm or Markov Chain Monte Carlo. The estimated parameters are keys to the inference of the features of the regression functions, but identifiability of these parameters has not been investigated. In this paper, we prove identifiability of covariance kernel parameters in two radial basis mixed kernel GPR and radial basis and periodic mixed kernel GPR. We also provide some examples about non-identifiable cases in such mixed kernel GPRs.
The bifactor model and its extensions are multidimensional latent variable models, under which each item measures up to one subdimension on top of the primary dimension(s). Despite their wide applications to educational and psychological assessments, this type of multidimensional latent variable models may suffer from non-identifiability, which can further lead to inconsistent parameter estimation and invalid inference. The current work provides a relatively complete characterization of identifiability for the linear and dichotomous bifactor models and the linear extended bifactor model with correlated subdimensions. In addition, similar results for the two-tier models are also developed. Illustrative examples are provided on checking model identifiability through inspecting the factor loading structure. Simulation studies are reported that examine estimation consistency when the identifiability conditions are/are not satisfied.
We develop new approaches in multi-class settings for constructing proper scoring rules and hinge-like losses and establishing corresponding regret bounds with respect to the zero-one or cost-weighted classification loss. Our construction of losses involves deriving new inverse mappings from a concave generalized entropy to a loss through the use of a convex dissimilarity function related to the multi-distribution $f$-divergence. Moreover, we identify new classes of multi-class proper scoring rules, which also recover and reveal interesting relationships between various composite losses currently in use. We establish new classification regret bounds in general for multi-class proper scoring rules by exploiting the Bregman divergences of the associated generalized entropies, and, as applications, provide simple meaningful regret bounds for two specific classes of proper scoring rules. Finally, we derive new hinge-like convex losses, which are tighter convex extensions than related hinge-like losses and geometrically simpler with fewer non-differentiable edges, while achieving similar regret bounds. We also establish a general classification regret bound for all losses which induce the same generalized entropy as the zero-one loss.
The Gini index is a popular inequality measure with many applications in social and economic studies. This paper studies semiparametric inference on the Gini indices of two semicontinuous populations. We characterize the distribution of each semicontinuous population by a mixture of a discrete point mass at zero and a continuous skewed positive component. A semiparametric density ratio model is then employed to link the positive components of the two distributions. We propose the maximum empirical likelihood estimators of the two Gini indices and their difference, and further investigate the asymptotic properties of the proposed estimators. The asymptotic results enable us to construct confidence intervals and perform hypothesis tests for the two Gini indices and their difference. We show that the proposed estimators are more efficient than the existing fully nonparametric estimators. The proposed estimators and the asymptotic results are also applicable to cases without excessive zero values. Simulation studies show the superiority of our proposed method over existing methods. Two real-data applications are presented using the proposed methods.
The treatment effects of the same therapy observed from multiple clinical trials can often be very different. Yet the patient characteristics accounting for these differences may not be identifiable in real world practice. There needs to be an unbiased way to combine the results from multiple trials and report the overall treatment effect for the general population during the development and validation of a new therapy. The non-linear structure of the maximum partial likelihood estimates for the (log) hazard ratio defined with a Cox proportional hazard model leads to challenges in the statistical analyses for combining such clinical trials. In this paper, we formulated the expected overall treatment effects using various modeling assumptions. Thus we are proposing efficient estimates and a version of Wald test for the combined hazard ratio using only aggregate data. Interpretation of the methods are provided in the framework of robust data analyses involving misspecified models.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
