Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOne-dimensional Coulomb multi-particle systems
188
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We consider the system of particles with equal charges and nearest neighbour Coulomb interaction on the interval. We study local properties of this system, in particular the distribution of distances between neighbouring charges. For zero temperature case there is sufficiently complete picture and we give a short review. For Gibbs distribution the situation is more difficult and we present two related results.
rate research
Read More
While 2D Gibbsian particle systems might exhibit orientational order resulting in a lattice-like structure, these particle systems do not exhibit positional order if the interaction between particles satisfies some weak assumptions. Here we investigate to which extent particles within a box of size $2n times 2n$ may fluctuate from their ideal lattice position. We show that particles near the center of the box typically show a displacement at least of order $sqrt{log n}$. Thus we extend recent results on the hard disk model to particle systems with fairly arbitrary particle spins and interaction. Our result applies to models such as rather general continuum Potts type models, e.g. with Widom-Rowlinson or Lenard-Jones-type interaction.
We consider the large-time behavior of the solution $ucolon [0,infty)timesZto[0,infty)$ to the parabolic Anderson problem $partial_t u=kappaDelta u+xi u$ with initial data $u(0,cdot)=1$ and non-positive finite i.i.d. potentials $(xi(z))_{zinZ}$. Unlike in dimensions $dge2$, the almost-sure decay rate of $u(t,0)$ as $ttoinfty$ is not determined solely by the upper tails of $xi(0)$; too heavy lower tails of $xi(0)$ accelerate the decay. The interpretation is that sites $x$ with large negative $xi(x)$ hamper the mass flow and hence screen off the influence of more favorable regions of the potential. The phenomenon is unique to $d=1$. The result answers an open question from our previous study cite{BK00} of this model in general dimension.
We have solved exactly the two-component Dirac equation in the presence of a spatially one-dimensional Hulthen potential, and presented the Dirac spinors of scattering states in terms of hypergeometric functions. We have calculated the reflection and transmission coefficients by the matching conditions on the wavefunctions, and investigated the condition for the existence of transmission resonances. Furthermore, we have demonstrated how the transmission-resonance condition depends on the shape of the potential.
We prove rigorously the occurrence of zero-mode Bose-Einstein condensation for a class of continuous homogeneous systems of boson particles with superstable interactions. This is the first example of a translation invariant continuous Bose-system, where the existence of the Bose-Einstein condensation is proved rigorously for the case of non-trivial two-body particle interactions, provided there is a large enough one-particle excitations spectral gap. The idea of proof consists of comparing the system with specially tuned soluble models.
In this paper we consider generalization of procedure of construction of potential systems for systems of partial differential equations with multidimensional spaces of conservation laws. More precisely, for construction of potential systems in cases when dimension of the space of local conservation laws is greater than one, instead of using only basis conservation laws we use their arbitrary linear combinations being inequivalent with respect to equivalence group of the class of systems or symmetry group of the fixed system. It appears that the basis conservation laws can be equivalent with respect to groups of symmetry or equivalence transformations, or vice versa, the number of independent in this sense linear combinations of conservation laws can be grater than the dimension of the space of conservation laws. The first possibility leads to an unnecessary, often cumbersome, investigation of equivalent systems, the second one makes possible missing a great number of inequivalent potential systems. Examples of all these possibilities are given.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
