Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userReply to the comment on Influence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Exchange Interaction on Quantum Phase Interference of Spins
237
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Wolfgang Wernsdorfer
Publication date
2009
fields
Physics
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
First version: del Barco et al. submitted recently a comment [arXiv:0812.4070] on our latest Phys. Rev. Lett. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 237204 (2008)], claiming three basic mistakes. We show here that their claims are unjustified and based on erroneous calculations and hasty conclusions. Second version: reply to the modified version of del Barco et al. submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.
rate research
Read More
In a recent Letter [1], Wernsdorfer et al. report an experimental study of a Mn12 molecular wheel which shows essentially identical behavior to the Mn12 wheel studied by Ramsey et al. [2]. In their Letter, Wernsdorfer et al. use the same model of a dimer of two exchange-coupled spins used in [2] as a basis to extend the study of the influence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction on the quantum tunneling of the magnetization of this system; in particular, they show that a tilt of the DM vector away from the uniaxial anisotropy axis can account for the asymmetric nature of the quantum interference minima associated with resonances between states of opposite parity, e.g., k = 1(A). We want to stress that the inclusion of DM interactions in a system with inversion symmetry cannot mix states of opposite parity; i.e., the parity operator commutes with the Hamiltonian. Consequently, the use by Wernsdorfer et al. of a single DM vector in a centrosymmetric dimer is strictly forbidden since it implicitly violates parity conservation. The authors correctly point out that the lack of an inversion center between each pair of manganese ions on the wheel justifies the possibility of local DM interactions, even though the complete molecule has an inversion center. However, these local DM interactions must also satisfy the molecular inversion symmetry; i.e., they cannot mix states of opposite parity.We agree that such DM interactions are not always completely innocuous; e.g., they can mix spin states having the same parity. Indeed, in kagome systems [3] (cited in [1]), this can lead to weak ferromagnetism. Nevertheless, the inversion symmetry of the lattice is preserved and parity is still conserved.
Magnetization measurements of a Mn12mda wheel single-molecule magnet with a spin ground state of S = 7 show resonant tunneling and quantum phase interference, which are established by studying the tunnel rates as a function of a transverse field applied along the hard magnetization axis. Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) exchange interaction allows the tunneling between different spin multiplets. It is shown that the quantum phase interference of these transitions is strongly dependent on the direction of the DM vector.
In this note, we reply to the comment made by E.I.Kats and V.V.Lebedev [arXiv:1407.4298] on our recent work Thermodynamics of quantum crystalline membranes [Phys. Rev. B 89, 224307 (2014)]. Kats and Lebedev question the validity of the calculation presented in our work, in particular on the use of a Debye momentum as a ultra-violet regulator for the theory. We address and counter argue the criticisms made by Kats and Lebedev to our work.
We argue that our analysis of the J-Q model, presented in Phys. Rev. B 80, 174403 (2009), and based on a field-theory description of coupled dimers, captures properly the strong quantum fluctuations tendencies, and the objections outlined by L. Isaev, G. Ortiz, and J. Dukelsky, arXiv:1003.5205, are misplaced.
Ab initio calculations show that the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction(DMI)and net magnetization per unit cell in BiFeO3 are reduced when U is increasing from 0 to 2.9 eV, and independent of $J$. Interestingly, the DMI is even destroyed as $U$ exceeds a critical value of 2.9 eV. We propose a simple model to explain this phenomenon and present the nature of the rotation of the magnetization corresponding to altered antiferrodistortive distortions under DMI in BiFeO3.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
