Several methods have been introduced to treat inflammatory
gingival enlargement including laser, electrocautery, and surgical
scalpel which is the standard method adopted. Recently, however,
ceramic bur has emerged as a simple and rapid tool for
gingivectomy
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare gingivectomy
by using ceramic bur and traditional gingivectomy by using
surgical scalpel.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of
gingivectomy by using traditional surgery procedure and Er:YaG
laser depending on the following clinical indications: the pain
after 2 hours and 24 hours of surgery procedure, healing of
gum aft
er surgery depending on rosiness and polypus
indications after removing periodontal dressing and gingival
bleeding during and after surgery.