اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدWeak signal identification and inference in penalized likelihood models for categorical responses
141
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Penalized likelihood models are widely used to simultaneously select variables and estimate model parameters. However, the existence of weak signals can lead to inaccurate variable selection, biased parameter estimation, and invalid inference. Thus, identifying weak signals accurately and making valid inferences are crucial in penalized likelihood models. In this paper, we develop a unified approach to identify weak signals and make inferences in penalized likelihood models, including the special case when the responses are categorical. To identify weak signals, we utilize the estimated selection probability of each covariate as a measure of signal strength and formulate a signal identification criterion. To construct confidence intervals, we adopt a two-step inference procedure. Extensive simulation studies show that the proposed two-step inference procedure outperforms several existing methods. We illustrate the proposed method with an application to the Practice Fusion diabetes dataset.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We address the issue of performing testing inference in generalized linear models when the sample size is small. This class of models provides a straightforward way of modeling normal and non-normal data and has been widely used in several practical
situations. The likelihood ratio, Wald and score statistics, and the recently proposed gradient statistic provide the basis for testing inference on the parameters in these models. We focus on the small-sample case, where the reference chi-squared distribution gives a poor approximation to the true null distribution of these test statistics. We derive a general Bartlett-type correction factor in matrix notation for the gradient test which reduces the size distortion of the test, and numerically compare the proposed test with the usual likelihood ratio, Wald, score and gradient tests, and with the Bartlett-corrected likelihood ratio and score tests. Our simulation results suggest that the corrected test we propose can be an interesting alternative to the other tests since it leads to very accurate inference even for very small samples. We also present an empirical application for illustrative purposes.
There have been controversies among statisticians on (i) what to model and (ii) how to make inferences from models with unobservables. One such controversy concerns the difference between estimation methods for the marginal means not necessarily havi
ng a probabilistic basis and statistical models having unobservables with a probabilistic basis. Another concerns likelihood-based inference for statistical models with unobservables. This needs an extended-likelihood framework, and we show how one such extension, hierarchical likelihood, allows this to be done. Modeling of unobservables leads to rich classes of new probabilistic models from which likelihood-type inferences can be made naturally with hierarchical likelihood.
Nonlinear Mixed effects models are hidden variables models that are widely used in many field such as pharmacometrics. In such models, the distribution characteristics of hidden variables can be specified by including several parameters such as covar
iates or correlations which must be selected. Recent development of pharmacogenomics has brought averaged/high dimensional problems to the field of nonlinear mixed effects modeling for which standard covariates selection techniques like stepwise methods are not well suited. This work proposes to select covariates and correlation parameters using a penalized likelihood approach. The penalized likelihood problem is solved using a stochastic proximal gradient algorithm to avoid inner-outer iterations. Speed of convergence of the proximal gradient algorithm is improved by the use of component-wise adaptive gradient step sizes. The practical implementation and tuning of the proximal gradient algorithm is explored using simulations. Calibration of regularization parameters is performed by minimizing the Bayesian Information Criterion using particle swarm optimization, a zero order optimization procedure. The use of warm restart and parallelization allows to reduce significantly computing time. The performance of the proposed method compared to the traditional grid search strategy is explored using simulated data. Finally, an application to real data from two pharmacokinetics studies is provided, one studying an antifibrinolitic and the other studying an antibiotic.
A maximum likelihood methodology for the parameters of models with an intractable likelihood is introduced. We produce a likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation expectation-maximization (SAEM) algorithm to maximize the likelihood func
tion of model parameters. While SAEM is best suited for models having a tractable complete likelihood function, its application to moderately complex models is a difficult or even impossible task. We show how to construct a likelihood-free version of SAEM by using the synthetic likelihood paradigm. Our method is completely plug-and-play, requires almost no tuning and can be applied to both static and dynamic models. Four simulation studies illustrate the method, including a stochastic differential equation model, a stochastic Lotka-Volterra model and data from $g$-and-$k$ distributions. MATLAB code is available as supplementary material.
Rejoinder to Likelihood Inference for Models with Unobservables: Another View by Youngjo Lee and John A. Nelder [arXiv:1010.0303]
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
