اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدPhylogeny of the Milky Ways inner disk and bulge populations: Implications for gas accretion, (the lack of) inside-out thick disk formation, and quenching
70
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We show that the bulge and the disk of the Milky Way (MW) at R$lesssim$7~kpc are well described by a unique chemical evolution and a two-phase star-formation history (SFH). We argue that the populations within this inner disk, not the entire disk, are the same, and that the outer Lindblad resonance (OLR) of the bar plays a key role in explaining this uniformity. In our model of a two-phase star formation history, the metallicity, [$alpha$/Fe] and [$alpha$/H] distributions, and age-metallicity relation are all compatible with the observations of both the inner disk and bulge. The dip at [Fe/H]$sim$0 dex seen in the metallicity distributions of the bulge and inner disk reflects the quenching episode in the SFH of the inner MW at age $sim$8 Gyr, and the common evolution of the bulge and inner disk stars. We show that at z$le$1.5, when the MW was starting to quench, transitioning between the end of the $alpha$-enhanced thick disk formation to the start of the thin disk, and yet was still gas rich, the gas accretion rate could not have been significant. The [$alpha$/Fe] abundance ratio before and after this quenching phase would be different, which is not observed. The present analysis suggests that Milky Way history, and in particular at the transition from the thick to the thin disk -- the epoch of the quenching -- must have been driven by a decrease of the star formation efficiency. We argue that the decline in the intensity of gas accretion, the formation of the bar, and the quenching of the SFR at the same epoch may be causally connected thus explaining their temporal coincidence (abridged).
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We analyse the chemical properties of a set of solar vicinity stars, and show that the small dispersion in abundances of alpha-elements at all ages provides evidence that the SFH has been uniform throughout the thick disk. In the context of long time
scale infall models, we suggest that this result points either to a limited dependence of the gas accretion on the Galactic radius in the inner disk (R<10 kpc), or to a decoupling of the accretion history and star formation history due to other processes governing the ISM in the early disk, suggesting that infall cannot be a determining parameter of the chemical evolution at these epochs. We argue however that these results and other recent observational constraints -- namely the lack of radial metallicity gradient and the non-evolving scale length of the thick disk -- are better explained if the early disk is viewed as a pre-assembled gaseous system, with most of the gas settled before significant star formation took place -- formally the equivalent of a closed-box model. In any case, these results point to a weak, or non-existent inside-out formation history in the thick disk, or in the first 3-5 Gyr of the formation of the Galaxy. We argue however that the growing importance of an external disk whose chemical properties are distinct from those of the inner disk would give the impression of an inside-out growth process when seen through snapshots at different epochs. However, the progressive, continuous process usually invoked may not have actually existed in the Milky Way.
This article is based on our discussion session on Milky Way models at the 592 WE-Heraeus Seminar, Reconstructing the Milky Ways History: Spectroscopic Surveys, Asteroseismology and Chemodynamical models. The discussion focused on the following quest
ion: Are there distinct thick and thin disks?. The answer to this question depends on the definition one adopts for thin and thick disks. The participants of this discussion converged to the idea that there are at least two different types of disks in the Milky Way. However, there are still important open questions on how to best define these two types of disks (chemically, kinematically, geometrically or by age?). The question of what is the origin of the distinct disks remains open. The future Galactic surveys which are highlighted in this conference should help us answering these questions. The almost one-hour debate involving researchers in the field representing different modelling approaches (Galactic models such as TRILEGAL, Besancon and Galaxia, chemical evolution models, extended distribution functions method, chemodynamics in the cosmological context, and self-consistent cosmological simulations) illustrated how important is to have all these parallel approaches. All approaches have their advantages and shortcomings (also discussed), and different approaches are useful to address specific points that might help us answering the more general question above.
The separation of the Milky Way disk into a thin and thick component is supported by differences in the spatial, kinematic and metallicity distributions of their stars. These differences have led to the view that the thick disk formed early via a cat
aclysmic event and constitutes fossil evidence of the hierarchical growth of the Milky Way. We show here, using N-body simulations, how a double-exponential vertical structure, with stellar populations displaying similar dichotomies can arise purely through internal evolution. In this picture, stars migrate radially, while retaining nearly circular orbits, as described by Sellwood & Binney (2002). As stars move outwards they populate a thickened component. Such stars found at the present time in the solar neighborhood formed early in the disks history at smaller radii where stars are more metal-poor and alpha-enhanced, leading to the properties observed for thick disk stars. Classifying stars as members of the thin or thick disk by either velocity or metallicity leads to an apparent separation in the other property as observed. This scenario is supported by the SDSS observation that stars in the transition region do not show any correlation between rotational velocity and metallicity. The good qualitative agreement between our simulation and observations in the Milky Way hint that the thick disk may be a ubiquitous galaxy feature generated by stellar migration. Nonetheless, we cannot exclude that some fraction of the thick disk is a fossil of a past more violent history, nor can this scenario explain thick disks in all galaxies.
We analyze 494 main sequence turnoff and subgiant stars from the AMBRE:HARPS survey. These stars have accurate astrometric information from textit{Gaia}/DR1, providing reliable age estimates with relative uncertainties of $pm1-2$ Gyr and allowing pre
cise orbital determinations. The sample is split based on chemistry into a low-[Mg/Fe] sequence, which are often identified as thin disk stellar populations, and a high-[Mg/Fe] sequence, which are often associated with the thick disk. We find that the high-[Mg/Fe] chemical sequence has extended star formation for several Gyr and is coeval with the oldest stars of the low-[Mg/Fe] chemical sequence: both the low- and high-[Mg/Fe] sequences were forming stars at the same time. The high-[Mg/Fe] stellar populations are only vertically extended for the oldest, most-metal poor and highest [Mg/Fe] stars. When comparing vertical velocity dispersion for both sequences, the high-[Mg/Fe] sequence has lower velocity dispersion than the low-[Mg/Fe] sequence for stars of similar age. Identifying either group as thin or thick disk based on chemistry is misleading. The stars belonging to the high-[Mg/Fe] sequence have perigalacticons that originate in the inner disk, while the perigalacticons of stars on the low-[Mg/Fe] sequence are generally around the solar neighborhood. From the orbital properties of the stars, the high-and low-[Mg/Fe] sequences are most likely a reflection of the chemical enrichment history of the inner and outer disk populations; radial mixing causes both populations to be observed in situ at the solar position. Based on these results, we emphasize that it is important to be clear in defining what populations are being referenced when using the terms thin and thick disk, and that ideally the term thick disk should be reserved for purely geometric definitions to avoid confusion and be consistent with definitions in external galaxies.
We test competing models that aim at explaining the nature of stars in the Milky Way that are well away (|z|$gtrsim$ 1kpc) from the midplane, the so-called thick disk: the stars may have gotten there through orbital migration, through satellite merge
rs and accretion, or through heating of pre-existing thin disk stars. Sales et al. (2009) proposed the eccentricity distribution of thick disk stars as a diagnostic to differentiate between these mechanisms. Drawing on SDSS DR7, we have assembled a sample of 34,223 G-dwarfs with 6-D phase-space information and metallicities, and have derived orbital eccentricities for them. Comparing the resulting eccentricity distributions, p(e|z), with the models, we find that: a) the observed p(e|z) is inconsistent with that predicted by orbital migration only, as there are more observed stars of high and of very low eccentricity; b) scenarios where the thick disk is made predominantly through abrupt heating of a pre-existing thin disk are also inconsistent, as they predict more high-eccentricity stars than observed; c) the observed p(e|z) fits well with a gas-rich merger scenario, where most thick disk stars were born from unsettled gas in situ.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
