اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدRORS: Enhanced Rule-based OWL Reasoning on Spark
163
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
The rule-based OWL reasoning is to compute the deductive closure of an ontology by applying RDF/RDFS and OWL entailment rules. The performance of the rule-based OWL reasoning is often sensitive to the rule execution order. In this paper, we present an approach to enhancing the performance of the rule-based OWL reasoning on Spark based on a locally optimal executable strategy. Firstly, we divide all rules (27 in total) into four main classes, namely, SPO rules (5 rules), type rules (7 rules), sameAs rules (7 rules), and schema rules (8 rules) since, as we investigated, those triples corresponding to the first three classes of rules are overwhelming (e.g., over 99% in the LUBM dataset) in our practical world. Secondly, based on the interdependence among those entailment rules in each class, we pick out an optimal rule executable order of each class and then combine them into a new rule execution order of all rules. Finally, we implement the new rule execution order on Spark in a prototype called RORS. The experimental results show that the running time of RORS is improved by about 30% as compared to Kim & Parks algorithm (2015) using the LUBM200 (27.6 million triples).
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Our concern is the overhead of answering OWL 2 QL ontology-mediated queries (OMQs) in ontology-based data access compared to evaluating their underlying tree-shaped and bounded treewidth conjunctive queries (CQs). We show that OMQs with bounded-depth
ontologies have nonrecursive datalog (NDL) rewritings that can be constructed and evaluated in LOGCFL for combined complexity, even in NL if their CQs are tree-shaped with a bounded number of leaves, and so incur no overhead in complexity-theoretic terms. For OMQs with arbitrary ontologies and bounded-leaf CQs, NDL-rewritings are constructed and evaluated in LOGCFL. We show experimentally feasibility and scalability of our rewritings compared to previously proposed NDL-rewritings. On the negative side, we prove that answering OMQs with tree-shaped CQs is not fixed-parameter tractable if the ontology depth or the number of leaves in the CQs is regarded as the parameter, and that answering OMQs with a fixed ontology (of infinite depth) is NP-complete for tree-shaped and LOGCFL for bounded-leaf CQs.
We propose hMDAP, a hybrid framework for large-scale data analytical processing on Spark, to support multi-paradigm process (incl. OLAP, machine learning, and graph analysis etc.) in distributed environments. The framework features a three-layer data
process module and a business process module which controls the former. We will demonstrate the strength of hMDAP by using traffic scenarios in a real world.
The objective of this work was to utilize BigBench [1] as a Big Data benchmark and evaluate and compare two processing engines: MapReduce [2] and Spark [3]. MapReduce is the established engine for processing data on Hadoop. Spark is a popular alterna
tive engine that promises faster processing times than the established MapReduce engine. BigBench was chosen for this comparison because it is the first end-to-end analytics Big Data benchmark and it is currently under public review as TPCx-BB [4]. One of our goals was to evaluate the benchmark by performing various scalability tests and validate that it is able to stress test the processing engines. First, we analyzed the steps necessary to execute the available MapReduce implementation of BigBench [1] on Spark. Then, all the 30 BigBench queries were executed on MapReduce/Hive with different scale factors in order to see how the performance changes with the increase of the data size. Next, the group of HiveQL queries were executed on Spark SQL and compared with their respective Hive runtimes. This report gives a detailed overview on how to setup an experimental Hadoop cluster and execute BigBench on both Hive and Spark SQL. It provides the absolute times for all experiments preformed for different scale factors as well as query results which can be used to validate correct benchmark execution. Additionally, multiple issues and workarounds were encountered and solved during our work. An evaluation of the resource utilization (CPU, memory, disk and network usage) of a subset of representative BigBench queries is presented to illustrate the behavior of the different query groups on both processing engines. Last but not least it is important to mention that larger parts of this report are taken from the master thesis of Max-Georg Beer, entitled Evaluation of BigBench on Apache Spark Compared to MapReduce [5].
The need for modern data analytics to combine relational, procedural, and map-reduce-style functional processing is widely recognized. State-of-the-art systems like Spark have added SQL front-ends and relational query optimization, which promise an i
ncrease in expressiveness and performance. But how good are these extensions at extracting high performance from modern hardware platforms? While Spark has made impressive progress, we show that for relational workloads, there is still a significant gap compared with best-of-breed query engines. And when stepping outside of the relational world, query optimization techniques are ineffective if large parts of a computation have to be treated as user-defined functions (UDFs). We present Flare: a new back-end for Spark that brings performance closer to the best SQL engines, without giving up the added expressiveness of Spark. We demonstrate order of magnitude speedups both for relational workloads such as TPC-H, as well as for a range of machine learning kernels that combine relational and iterative functional processing. Flare achieves these results through (1) compilation to native code, (2) replacing parts of the Spark runtime system, and (3) extending the scope of optimization and code generation to large classes of UDFs.
Materialisation is often used in RDF systems as a preprocessing step to derive all facts implied by given RDF triples and rules. Although widely used, materialisation considers all possible rule applications and can use a lot of memory for storing th
e derived facts, which can hinder performance. We present a novel materialisation technique that compresses the RDF triples so that the rules can sometimes be applied to multiple facts at once, and the derived facts can be represented using structure sharing. Our technique can thus require less space, as well as skip certain rule applications. Our experiments show that our technique can be very effective: when the rules are relatively simple, our system is both faster and requires less memory than prominent state-of-the-art RDF systems.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
