ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Statistical inference on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is an important task in brain imaging. One major hypothesis is that the presence or not of a psychiatric disorder can be explained by the differential clustering of neurons in the brain. In view of this fact, it is clearly of interest to address the question of whether the properties of the clusters have changed between groups of patients and controls. The normal method of approaching group differences in brain imaging is to carry out a voxel-wise univariate analysis for a difference between the mean group responses using an appropriate test (e.g. a t-test) and to assemble the resulting significantly different voxels into clusters, testing again at cluster level. In this approach of course, the primary voxel-level test is blind to any cluster structure. Direct assessments of differences between groups (or reproducibility within groups) at the cluster level have been rare in brain imaging. For this reason, we introduce a novel statistical test called ANOCVA - ANalysis Of Cluster structure Variability, which statistically tests whether two or more populations are equally clustered using specific features. The proposed method allows us to compare the clustering structure of multiple groups simultaneously, and also to identify features that contribute to the differential clustering. We illustrate the performance of ANOCVA through simulations and an application to an fMRI data set composed of children with ADHD and controls. Results show that there are several differences in the brains clustering structure between them, corroborating the hypothesis in the literature. Furthermore, we identified some brain regions previously not described, generating new hypothesis to be tested empirically.
Statistical modeling plays a fundamental role in understanding the underlying mechanism of massive data (statistical inference) and predicting the future (statistical prediction). Although all models are wrong, researchers try their best to make some
Clustering methods have led to a number of important discoveries in bioinformatics and beyond. A major challenge in their use is determining which clusters represent important underlying structure, as opposed to spurious sampling artifacts. This chal
Disease maps display the spatial pattern in disease risk, so that high-risk clusters can be identified. The spatial structure in the risk map is typically represented by a set of random effects, which are modelled with a conditional autoregressive (C
The tau statistic $tau$ uses geolocation and, usually, symptom onset time to assess global spatiotemporal clustering from epidemiological data. We test different factors that could affect graphical hypothesis tests of clustering or bias clustering ra
Longitudinal cohorts to determine the incidence of HIV infection are logistically challenging, so researchers have sought alternative strategies. Recency test methods use biomarker profiles of HIV-infected subjects in a cross-sectional sample to infe