ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We obtain a lower limit on the compactification scale of extra dimension via comparison of the branching ratio in the baryonic $Lambda_brightarrow Lambda mu^+ mu^-$ decay channel recently measured by CDF collaboration and our previous theoretical study. We also use the newly available form factors calculated via light cone QCD sum rules in full theory to analyze the flavour changing neutral current process of the $Sigma_b rightarrow Sigma ell^+ ell^-$ in universal extra dimension scenario in the presence of a single extra compact dimension. We calculate various physical quantities like branching ratio, forward-backward asymmetry, baryon polarizations and double lepton polarization asymmetries defining the decay channel under consideration. We also compare the obtained predictions with those of the standard model.
We comparatively analyze the flavor changing neutral current process of the $Lambda_b rightarrow Lambda ell^+ ell^-$ in the standard model as well as topcolor-assisted technicolor model using the form factors calculated via light cone QCD sum rules i
We comparatively analyze the rare $Lambda _brightarrow Lambda ell^+ ell^-$ channel in standard model, supersymmetry and Randall-Sundrum model with custodial protection (RS$_c$). Using the parametrization of the matrix elements entering the low energy
We work out the semileptonic $Lambda_brightarrow Lambda ell^+ ell^-$ transition in standard as well as different supersymmetric models. In particular, considering the parametrization of the matrix elements entered the low energy effective Hamiltonian
We discuss the general properties of the amplitude of the $Bto l^+l^-l u$ decays and calculate the related kinematical distributions $d^2Gamma/dq^2dq^2$, $q$ the momentum of the $l^+l^-$ pair emitted from the electromagnetic vertex and $q$ the moment
Using the responsible form factors calculated via full QCD, we analyze the $Lambda_{b}rightarrow Lambda ell^{+}ell^{-}$ transition in the standard model containing fourth generation quarks (SM4). We discuss effects of the presence of $t$ fourth famil