ترغب بنشر مسار تعليمي؟ اضغط هنا

Linear groups in Galois fields. A case study of tacit circulation of explicit knowledge

227   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 نشر من قبل Frederic Brechenmacher
 تاريخ النشر 2012
  مجال البحث
والبحث باللغة English




اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث

This preprint is the extended version of a paper that will be published in the proceedings of the Oberwolfach conference Explicit vs tacit knowledge in mathematics (January 2012). It presents a case study on some algebraic researches at the turn of the twentieth century that involved mainly French and American authors. By investigating the collective dimensions of these works, this paper sheds light on the tension between the tacit and the explicit in the ways some groups of texts hold together, thereby constituting some shared algebraic cultures. Although prominent algebraists such as Dickson made extensive references to papers published in France, and despite the roles played by algebra and arithmetic in the development of the American mathematical community, our knowledge of the circulations of knowledge between France and the United States at the beginning of the 20th century is still very limited. It is my aim to tackle such issues through the case study of a specific collective approach to finite group theory at the turn of the 20th century. This specific approach can be understood as a shared algebraic culture based on the long run circulation of some specific procedures of decompositions of the analytic forms of substitutions. In this context, the general linear group was introduced as the maximal group in which an elementary abelian group (i.e., the multiplicative group of a Galois field) is a normal subgroup.



قيم البحث

اقرأ أيضاً

The application of mathematics and statistical methods to scholarly communication: scientometrics, has facilitated the systematic analysis of the modern digital tide of literature. This chapter reviews three of such applications: coauthorship, biblio graphic coupling, and coword networks. It also presents an exploratory case of study for the knowledge circulation literature. It was found a diverse geographical production, mainly in the Global North and Asian institutions with significant intermediation of universities from USA, Colombia, and Japan. The research fronts identified were related to science and medicines history and philosophy; education, health, policy studies; and a set of interdisciplinary topics. Finally, the knowledge pillars were comprised of urban planning policy, economic geography, and historical and theoretical perspectives in the Netherlands and Central Europe; globalization and science, technology, and innovation and historical and institutional frameworks in the UK; and cultural and learning studies in the XXI century.
This paper appeals to the figure of Evariste Galois for investigating the gates between mathematics and their publics. The figure of Galois draws some lines of/within mathematics for/from the outside of mathematics and these lines in turn sketch the silhouette of Galois as a historical figure. The present paper especially investigates the collective categories that have been used in various types of public discourses on Galoiss work (e.g. equations, groups, algebra, analysis, France, Germany etc.). In a way, this paper aims at shedding light on the boundaries some individuals drew by getting Galois his gun. It is our aim to highlight the roles of authority some individuals (such as as Picard) took on in regard with the public figure of Galois as well as the roles such authorities assigned to other individuals (such as the mediating role assigned to Jordan as a mediator between Galoiss ideas and the public). The boundary-works involved by most public references to Galois have underlying them a long-term tension between academic and public legitimacies in the definition of some models for mathematical lives (or mathematics personae)
165 - Yonathan Stone 2020
This is an English translation of Nikolai Chebotaryovs paper Die Probleme der modernen Galoisschen Theorie from 1932. An excerpt from this paper was given as a lecture at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Zurich in 1932. With the lectur e being given to commememorate the centennial of Evariste Galois death, the paper is a broad survey of various contemporary problems in Galois Theory the author found represented the culminations of work done by Galois and his successors.
We present the (Lascar) Galois group of any countable theory as a quotient of a compact Polish group by an $F_sigma$ normal subgroup: in general, as a topological group, and under NIP, also in terms of Borel cardinality. This allows us to obtain simi lar results for arbitrary strong types defined on a single complete type over $emptyset$. As an easy conclusion of our main theorem, we get the main result from our recent paper joint with Andand Pillay, which says that for any strong type defined on a single complete type over $emptyset$, smoothness is equivalent to type-definability. We also explain how similar results are obtained in the case of bounded quotients of type-definable groups. This gives us a generalization of a former result from the aforementioned paper about bounded quotients of type-definable subgroups of definable groups.
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا