اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدThe Last Aproach to the Settlement of the Jacobian Conjecture
122
0
0.0
(
0
)
تأليف
Susumu Oda
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Let S be a polynomial ring over a field of characteristic zero in finitely may variables. Let T be an unramified, finitely generated extension of S with $T^times = k^times$. Then T = S.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
This article has been withdrown by the author.
We describe an algorithm that computes possible corners of hypothetical counterexamples to the Jacobian Conjecture up to a given bound. Using this algorithm we compute the possible families corresponding to $gcd(deg(P),deg(Q))le 35$, and all the pair
s $(deg(P),deg(Q))$ with $max(deg(P),deg(Q))le 150$ for any hypothetical counterexample.
We prove that if the Jacobian Conjecture in two variables is false and (P,Q) is a standard minimal pair, then the Newton polygon HH(P) of P must satisfy several restrictions that had not been found previously. This allows us to discard some of the co
rners found in [GGV, Remark 7.14] for HH(P), together with some of the infinite families found in [H, Theorem~2.25]
Our goal is to settle a fading problem, the Jacobian Conjecture $(JC_n)$~: If $f_1, cdots, f_n$ are elements in a polynomial ring $k[X_1, cdots, X_n]$ over a field $k$ of characteristic zero such that $ det(partial f_i/ partial X_j) $ is a nonzero
constant, then $k[f_1, cdots, f_n] = k[X_1, cdots, X_n]$. Practically, what we deal with is the generalized one, oindent The Generalized Jacobian Conjecture$(GJC)$ :{it Let $S hookrightarrow T$ be an unramified homomorphism of Noetherian domains. Assume that $S$ is a simply connected UFD ({sl i.e.,} ${rm Spec}(S)$ is simply connected and $S$ is a unique factorization domain) and that $T^times cap S = S^times$. Then $T = S$.} In addition, for consistency of the discussion, we raise some serious (or idiot) questions and some comments about the examples appeared in the papers published by the certain excellent mathematicians (though we are not willing to deal with them). However, the existence of such examples would be against our Main Result above, so that we have to dispute in Appendix B their arguments about the existence of their respective (so called) counter-examples. Our conclusion is that they are not perfect counter-examples which is shown explicitly.
Mustac{t}u{a} has given a conjecture for the graded Betti numbers in the minimal free resolution of the ideal of a general set of points on an irreducible projective algebraic variety. For surfaces in $mathbb P^3$ this conjecture has been proven for
points on quadric surfaces and on general cubic surfaces. In the latter case, Gorenstein liaison was the main tool. Here we prove the conjecture for general quartic surfaces. Gorenstein liaison continues to be a central tool, but to prove the existence of our links we make use of certain dimension computations. We also discuss the higher degree case, but now the dimension count does not force the existence of our links.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
