اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدRevisiting Epistemic Logic with Names
132
0
0.0
(
0
)
تأليف
Marta Bilkova
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
This paper revisits the multi-agent epistemic logic presented in [10], where agents and sets of agents are replaced by abstract, intensional names. We make three contributions. First, we study its model theory, providing adequate notions of bisimulation and frame morphisms, and use them to study the logics expressive power and definability. Second, we show that the logic has a natural neighborhood semantics, which in turn allows to show that the axiomatization in [10] does not rely on possibly controversial introspective properties of knowledge. Finally, we extend the logic with common and distributed knowledge operators, and provide a sound and complete axiomatization for each of these extensions. These results together put the original epistemic logic with names in a more modern context and opens the door for a logical analysis of epistemic phenomena where group membership is uncertain or variable.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We introduce a modal logic for describing statistical knowledge, which we call statistical epistemic logic. We propose a Kripke model dealing with probability distributions and stochastic assignments, and show a stochastic semantics for the logic. To
our knowledge, this is the first semantics for modal logic that can express the statistical knowledge dependent on non-deterministic inputs and the statistical significance of observed results. By using statistical epistemic logic, we express a notion of statistical secrecy with a confidence level. We also show that this logic is useful to formalize statistical hypothesis testing and differential privacy in a simple and abstract manner.
Coalition logic is one of the most popular logics for multi-agent systems. While epistemic extensions of coalition logic have received much attention, existence of their complete axiomatisations has so far been an open problem. In this paper we settl
e several of those problems. We prove completeness for epistemic coalition logic with common knowledge, with distributed knowledge, and with both common and distributed knowledge, respectively.
This paper presents a two-dimensional modal logic for reasoning about the changing patterns of knowledge and social relationships in networks organised on the basis of a symmetric friendship relation, providing a precise language for exploring logic
in the community [11]. Agents are placed in the model, allowing us to express such indexical facts as I am your friend and You, my friends, are in danger. The technical framework for this work is general dynamic dynamic logic (GDDL) [4], which provides a general method for extending modal logics with dynamic operators for reasoning about a wide range of model-transformations, starting with those definable in propositional dynamic logic (PDL) and extended to allow for the more subtle operators involved in, for example, private communication, as represented in dynamic epistemic logic (DEL) and related systems. We provide a hands-on introduction to GDDL, introducing elements of the formalism as we go, but leave the reader to consult [4] for technical details. Instead, the purpose of this paper is to investigate a number of conceptual issues that arise when considering communication between agents in such networks, both from one agent to another, and broadcasts to socially-defined groups of agents, such as the group of my friends.
The paper analyzes dynamic epistemic logic from a topological perspective. The main contribution consists of a framework in which dynamic epistemic logic satisfies the requirements for being a topological dynamical system thus interfacing discrete dy
namic logics with continuous mappings of dynamical systems. The setting is based on a notion of logical convergence, demonstratively equivalent with convergence in Stone topology. Presented is a flexible, parametrized family of metrics inducing the latter, used as an analytical aid. We show maps induced by action model transformations continuous with respect to the Stone topology and present results on the recurrent behavior of said maps.
The standard semantics of multi-agent epistemic logic $S5$ is based on Kripke models whose accessibility relations are reflexive, symmetric and transitive. This one dimensional structure contains implicit higher-dimensional information beyond pairwis
e interactions, that has been formalized as pure simplicial models in previous work from the authors. Here we extend the theory to encompass all simplicial models - including the ones that are not pure. The corresponding Kripke models are those where the accessibility relation is symmetric and transitive, but might not be reflexive. This yields the epistemic logic $KB4$ which can reason about situations where some of the agents may die.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
