اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدBuilding the perfect game -- an empirical study of game modifications
75
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Game developers cannot always meet the growing and changing needs of the gaming community, due to the often already overloaded schedules of developers. So-called modders can potentially assist game developers with addressing gamers needs. Modders are enthusiasts who provide modifications or completely new content for a game. By supporting modders, game developers can meet the rapidly growing and varying needs of their gamer base. Modders have the potential to play a role in extending the life expectancy of a game, thereby saving game developers time and money, and leading to a better overall gaming experience for their gamer base. In this paper, we empirically study the metadata of 9,521 mods of the 20 most-modded games on the Nexus Mods distribution platform. Our goal is to provide useful insights into the modding community of the Nexus Mods distribution platform from a quantitative perspective, and to provide researchers with a solid foundation for future exploration of game mods. In doing so, game developers can potentially reduce development time and cost due to the increased replayability of their games through mods. We find that providing official support for mods can be beneficial for the perceived quality of the mods of a game. In addition, mod users are willing to submit bug reports for a mod. However, they often fail to do this in a systematic manner using the bug reporting tool of the Nexus Mods platform, resulting in low-quality bug reports which are difficult to resolve. Based on our findings, we recommend that game developers who desire an active modding community for their own games provide the modding community with an officially-supported modding tool. In addition, we recommend that mod distribution platforms, such as Nexus Mods, improve their bug reporting system to receive higher quality bug reports.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
TouchDevelop is a new programming environment that allows users to create applications on mobile devices. Applications created with TouchDevelop have continued to grow in popularity since TouchDevelop was first released to public in 2011. This paper
presents a field study of 31,699 applications, focusing on different characteristics between 539 game scripts and all other non-game applications, as well as what make some game applications more popular than others to users. The study provides a list of findings on characteristics of game scripts and also implications for improving end-user programming of game applications.
GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime to execute queries. Using GraphQL queries, clients define precisely what data they wish to retrieve or mutate on a server, leading to fewer round trips and reduced response sizes. Although interest i
n GraphQL is on the rise, with increasing adoption at major organizations, little is known about what GraphQL interfaces look like in practice. This lack of knowledge makes it hard for providers to understand what practices promote idiomatic, easy-to-use APIs, and what pitfalls to avoid. To address this gap, we study the design of GraphQL interfaces in practice by analyzing their schemas - the descriptions of their exposed data types and the possible operations on the underlying data. We base our study on two novel corpuses of GraphQL schemas, one of 16 commercial GraphQL schemas and the other of 8,399 GraphQL schemas mined from GitHub projects. We make both corpuses available to other researchers. Using these corpuses, we characterize the size of schemas and their use of GraphQL features and assess the use of both prescribed and organic naming conventions. We also report that a majority of APIs are susceptible to denial of service through complex queries, posing real security risks previously discussed only in theory. We also assess ways in which GraphQL APIs attempt to address these concerns.
It is becoming increasingly difficult for game developers to manage the cost of developing a game, while meeting the high expectations of gamers. One way to balance the increasing gamer expectation and development stress is to build an active modding
community around the game. There exist several examples of games with an extremely active and successful modding community, with the Minecraft game being one of the most notable ones. This paper reports on an empirical study of 1,114 popular and 1,114 unpopular Minecraft mods from the CurseForge mod distribution platform, one of the largest distribution platforms for Minecraft mods. We analyzed the relationship between 33 features across 5 dimensions of mod characteristics and the popularity of mods (i.e., mod category, mod documentation, environmental context of the mod, remuneration for the mod, and community contribution for the mod), to understand the characteristics of popular Minecraft mods. We firstly verify that the studied dimensions have significant explanatory power in distinguishing the popularity of the studied mods. Then we evaluated the contribution of each of the 33 features across the 5 dimensions. We observed that popular mods tend to have a high quality description and promote community contribution.
Software systems are designed according to guidelines and constraints defined by business rules. Some of these constraints define the allowable or required values for data handled by the systems. These data constraints usually originate from the prob
lem domain (e.g., regulations), and developers must write code that enforces them. Understanding how data constraints are implemented is essential for testing, debugging, and software change. Unfortunately, there are no widely-accepted guidelines or best practices on how to implement data constraints. This paper presents an empirical study that investigates how data constraints are implemented in Java. We study the implementation of 187 data constraints extracted from the documentation of eight real-world Java software systems. First, we perform a qualitative analysis of the textual description of data constraints and identify four data constraint types. Second, we manually identify the implementations of these data constraints and reveal that they can be grouped into 30 implementation patterns. The analysis of these implementation patterns indicates that developers prefer a handful of patterns when implementing data constraints and deviations from these patterns are associated with unusual implementation decisions or code smells. Third, we develop a tool-assisted protocol that allows us to identify 256 additional trace links for the data constraints implemented using the 13 most common patterns. We find that almost half of these data constraints have multiple enforcing statements, which are code clones of different types.
In empirical game-theoretic analysis (EGTA), game models are extended iteratively through a process of generating new strategies based on learning from experience with prior strategies. The strategy exploration problem in EGTA is how to direct this p
rocess so to construct effective models with minimal iteration. A variety of approaches have been proposed in the literature, including methods based on classic techniques and novel concepts. Comparing the performance of these alternatives can be surprisingly subtle, depending sensitively on criteria adopted and measures employed. We investigate some of the methodological considerations in evaluating strategy exploration, defining key distinctions and identifying a few general principles based on examples and experimental observations. In particular, we emphasize the fact that empirical games create a space of strategies that should be evaluated as a whole. Based on this fact, we suggest that the minimum regret constrained profile (MRCP) provides a particularly robust basis for evaluating a space of strategies, and propose a local search method for MRCP that outperforms previous approaches. However, the computation of MRCP is not always feasible especially in large games. In this scenario, we highlight consistency considerations for comparing across different approaches. Surprisingly, we find that recent works violate these considerations that are necessary for evaluation, which may result in misleading conclusions on the performance of different approaches. For proper evaluation, we propose a new evaluation scheme and demonstrate that our scheme can reveal the true learning performance of different approaches compared to previous evaluation methods.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
