اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدDetecting conflicting summary statistics in likelihood-free inference
127
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Bayesian likelihood-free methods implement Bayesian inference using simulation of data from the model to substitute for intractable likelihood evaluations. Most likelihood-free inference methods replace the full data set with a summary statistic before performing Bayesian inference, and the choice of this statistic is often difficult. The summary statistic should be low-dimensional for computational reasons, while retaining as much information as possible about the parameter. Using a recent idea from the interpretable machine learning literature, we develop some regression-based diagnostic methods which are useful for detecting when different parts of a summary statistic vector contain conflicting information about the model parameters. Conflicts of this kind complicate summary statistic choice, and detecting them can be insightful about model deficiencies and guide model improvement. The diagnostic methods developed are based on regression approaches to likelihood-free inference, in which the regression model estimates the posterior density using summary statistics as features. Deletion and imputation of part of the summary statistic vector within the regression model can remove conflicts and approximate posterior distributions for summary statistic subsets. A larger than expected change in the estimated posterior density following deletion and imputation can indicate a conflict in which inferences of interest are affected. The usefulness of the new methods is demonstrated in a number of real examples.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Bayesian inference without the access of likelihood, or likelihood-free inference, has been a key research topic in simulations, to yield a more realistic generation result. Recent likelihood-free inference updates an approximate posterior sequential
ly with the dataset of the cumulative simulation input-output pairs over inference rounds. Therefore, the dataset is gathered through the iterative simulations with sampled inputs from a proposal distribution by MCMC, which becomes the key of inference quality in this sequential framework. This paper introduces a new proposal modeling, named as Implicit Surrogate Proposal (ISP), to generate a cumulated dataset with further sample efficiency. ISP constructs the cumulative dataset in the most diverse way by drawing i.i.d samples via a feed-forward fashion, so the posterior inference does not suffer from the disadvantages of MCMC caused by its non-i.i.d nature, such as auto-correlation and slow mixing. We analyze the convergence property of ISP in both theoretical and empirical aspects to guarantee that ISP provides an asymptotically exact sampler. We demonstrate that ISP outperforms the baseline inference algorithms on simulations with multi-modal posteriors.
A maximum likelihood methodology for the parameters of models with an intractable likelihood is introduced. We produce a likelihood-free version of the stochastic approximation expectation-maximization (SAEM) algorithm to maximize the likelihood func
tion of model parameters. While SAEM is best suited for models having a tractable complete likelihood function, its application to moderately complex models is a difficult or even impossible task. We show how to construct a likelihood-free version of SAEM by using the synthetic likelihood paradigm. Our method is completely plug-and-play, requires almost no tuning and can be applied to both static and dynamic models. Four simulation studies illustrate the method, including a stochastic differential equation model, a stochastic Lotka-Volterra model and data from $g$-and-$k$ distributions. MATLAB code is available as supplementary material.
Parameter estimation, statistical tests and confidence sets are the cornerstones of classical statistics that allow scientists to make inferences about the underlying process that generated the observed data. A key question is whether one can still c
onstruct hypothesis tests and confidence sets with proper coverage and high power in a so-called likelihood-free inference (LFI) setting; that is, a setting where the likelihood is not explicitly known but one can forward-simulate observable data according to a stochastic model. In this paper, we present $texttt{ACORE}$ (Approximate Computation via Odds Ratio Estimation), a frequentist approach to LFI that first formulates the classical likelihood ratio test (LRT) as a parametrized classification problem, and then uses the equivalence of tests and confidence sets to build confidence regions for parameters of interest. We also present a goodness-of-fit procedure for checking whether the constructed tests and confidence regions are valid. $texttt{ACORE}$ is based on the key observation that the LRT statistic, the rejection probability of the test, and the coverage of the confidence set are conditional distribution functions which often vary smoothly as a function of the parameters of interest. Hence, instead of relying solely on samples simulated at fixed parameter settings (as is the convention in standard Monte Carlo solutions), one can leverage machine learning tools and data simulated in the neighborhood of a parameter to improve estimates of quantities of interest. We demonstrate the efficacy of $texttt{ACORE}$ with both theoretical and empirical results. Our implementation is available on Github.
High-dimensional statistical inference with general estimating equations are challenging and remain less explored. In this paper, we study two problems in the area: confidence set estimation for multiple components of the model parameters, and model
specifications test. For the first one, we propose to construct a new set of estimating equations such that the impact from estimating the high-dimensional nuisance parameters becomes asymptotically negligible. The new construction enables us to estimate a valid confidence region by empirical likelihood ratio. For the second one, we propose a test statistic as the maximum of the marginal empirical likelihood ratios to quantify data evidence against the model specification. Our theory establishes the validity of the proposed empirical likelihood approaches, accommodating over-identification and exponentially growing data dimensionality. The numerical studies demonstrate promising performance and potential practical benefits of the new methods.
The Birnbaum-Saunders regression model is commonly used in reliability studies. We address the issue of performing inference in this class of models when the number of observations is small. We show that the likelihood ratio test tends to be liberal
when the sample size is small, and we obtain a correction factor which reduces the size distortion of the test. The correction makes the error rate of he test vanish faster as the sample size increases. The numerical results show that the modified test is more reliable in finite samples than the usual likelihood ratio test. We also present an empirical application.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
