ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We have studied, in a series of papers, the properties of the $M_{bullet}$ versus $M_{G}sigma^2$ relation and we have found that it is useful to describe the evolution of galaxies in the same way as the HR diagram does for stars and to predict the masses of Supermassive Black Holes that are difficult to be guessed using other scaling relations. In this paper, analyzing five samples of galaxies, we find that this relation has intrinsic scatter similar to the $M_{bullet} - sigma$, but follows the theoretical models much better than the $M_{bullet} - sigma$. Furthermore, we analyze the role of the bulge mass in the behavior of $M_{bullet}$ versus $M_{G}sigma^2$ relation because the difference with the $M_{bullet} - sigma$ is often determined by the choice of the right sample of galactic masses.
In the context of scaling relations between Supermassive Black Holes and host-galaxy properties, we aim to enhance the comparison between $M_{bullet} - M_{G}sigma^2$ and $M_{bullet} - sigma$ relations from a statistical point of view. First, it is su
Strong scaling relations between host galaxy properties (such as stellar mass, bulge mass, luminosity, effective radius etc) and their nuclear supermassive black holes mass point towards a close co-evolution. In this work, we first review previous ef
In this paper we want to compare the theoretical predictions of a law proposed by Feoli and Mancini, with the most recent experimental data about galaxies and Supermassive black holes. The physical principle behind this law is the transformation of t
[Abridged] We investigate the nature of the relations between black hole (BH) mass ($M_{rm BH}$) and the central velocity dispersion ($sigma$) and, for core-Sersic galaxies, the size of the depleted core ($R_{rm b}$). Our sample of 144 galaxies with
We use the stellar kinematics for $2458$ galaxies from the MaNGA survey to explore dynamical scaling relations between the stellar mass $M_{star}$ and the total velocity parameter at the effective radius, $R_e$, defined as $S_{K}^{2}=KV_{R_e}^{2}+sig