ترغب بنشر مسار تعليمي؟ اضغط هنا

Inferring the Age of the Universe with Globular Clusters

145   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 نشر من قبل Raul Jimenez
 تاريخ النشر 2020
  مجال البحث فيزياء
والبحث باللغة English




اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث

We present an estimate of the absolute age of 68 galactic globular clusters obtained by exploiting the distribution of stars in the full color-magnitude diagram. In particular, we jointly estimate the absolute age, distance, reddening, metallicity ([Fe/H]) and [$alpha$/Fe] of each cluster, imposing priors motivated by independent observations; we also estimate possible systematics from stellar modeling. Our derived distances for the globular cluster sample are in agreement with those obtained from GAIA using main-sequence dwarf stars (where available), and the inferred ages are in good agreement with those previously published. The novelty of our approach is that, with the adopted priors, we are able to estimate robustly these parameters from the globular cluster color-magnitude diagram. We find that the average age of the oldest globular clusters is $t_{rm GC}=13.32 pm 0.1 {rm (stat.)} pm 0.5 {rm (sys.)}$, at 68% confidence level, including systematic uncertainties from stellar modeling. These measurements can be used to infer the age of the Universe, largely independently of the cosmological parameters: we find an age of the Universe $t_{rm U}=13.5^{+0.16}_{-0.14} {rm (stat.)} pm 0.5 ({rm sys.})$ at 68% confidence level, accounting for the formation time of globular clusters and its uncertainty. This value is compatible with $13.8 pm 0.02$ Gyr, the cosmological model-dependent value inferred by the Planck mission assuming the $Lambda$CDM model.

قيم البحث

اقرأ أيضاً

The dominant systematic uncertainty in the age determination of galactic globular clusters is the depth of the convection envelope of the stars. This parameter is partially degenerate with metallicity which is in turn degenerate with age. However, if the metal content, distance and extinction are known, the position and morphology of the red giant branch in a color-magnitude diagram are mostly sensitive to the value of the depth of the convective envelope. Therefore, using external, precise metallicity determinations this degeneracy and thus the systematic error in age, can be reduced. Alternatively, the morphology of the red giant branch of globular clusters color magnitude diagram can also be used to achieve the same. We demonstrate that globular cluster red giant branches are well fitted by values of the depth of the convection envelope consistent with those obtained for the Sun and this finding is robust to the adopted treatment of the stellar physics. With these findings, the uncertainty in the depth of the convection envelope is no longer the dominant contribution to the systematic error in the age determination of the oldest globular clusters, reducing it from $0.5$ to $0.23$ or $0.33$ Gyr, depending on the methodology adopted: i.e., whether resorting to external data (spectroscopic metallicity determinations) or relying solely on the morphology of the clusterss color-magnitude diagrams. This results in an age of the Universe $t_{rm U}=13.5^{+0.16}_{-0.14} {rm (stat.)} pm 0.23(0.33) ({rm sys.})$ at 68% confidence level, accounting for the formation time of globular clusters and its uncertainty. An uncertainty of 0.27(0.36) Gyr if added in quadrature. This agrees well with $13.8 pm 0.02$ Gyr, the cosmological model-dependent value inferred by the Planck mission assuming the $Lambda$CDM model.
We performed the photometric analysis of M2 and M92 globular clusters in g and r bands of SLOAN photometric system. We transformed these g and r bands into BV bands of Johnson-Cousins photometric system and built the color magnitude diagram (CMD). We estimated the age, and metallicity of both the clusters, by fitting Padova isochrones of different age and metallicities onto the CMD. We studied Einstein and de Sitter model, bench mark model, the cosmological parameters by WMAP and Planck surveys. Finally, we compared estimated age of globular clusters to the ages from the cosmological models and cosmological parameters values of WMAP and Planck surveys.
102 - Jun Ma 2009
This paper supplements Jiang et al. (2003), who studied 172 M31 globular clusters (GCs) and globular cluster candidates from Battistini et al. (1987) on the basis of integrated photometric measurements in the Beijing-Arizona-Taiwan-Connecticut (BATC) photometric system. Here, we present multicolor photometric CCD data (in the BATC system) for the remaining 39 M31 GCs and candidates. In addition, the ages of 35 GCs are constrained by comparing our accurate photometry with updated theoretical stellar synthesis models. We use photometric measurements from GALEX in the far- and near-ultraviolet and 2MASS infrared $JHK_s$ data, in combination with optical photometry. Except for two clusters, the ages of the other sample GCs are all older than 1 Gyr. Their age distribution shows that most sample clusters are younger than 6 Gyr, with a peak at ~3 Gyr, although the `usual complement of well-known old GCs (i.e., GCs of similar age as the majority of the Galactic GCs) is present as well.
We introduce a new set of large N-body runs, the MICE simulations, that provide a unique combination of very large cosmological volumes with good mass resolution. They follow the gravitational evolution of ~ 8.5 billion particles (2048^3) in volumes covering up to 450 (Gpc/h)^3. Our main goal is to accurately model and calibrate basic cosmological probes that will be used by upcoming astronomical surveys. Here we take advantage of the very large volumes of MICE to make a robust sampling of the high-mass tail of the halo mass function (MF). We discuss and avoid possible systematic effects in our study, and do a detailed analysis of different error estimators. We find that available fits to the local abundance of halos (Warren et al. (2006)) match well the abundance in MICE up to M ~ 10^{14}Msun, but significantly deviate for larger masses, underestimating the mass function by 10% (30%) at M = 3.16 x 10^{14}Msun (10^{15}Msun). Similarly, the widely used Sheth & Tormen (1999) fit, if extrapolated to high redshift assuming universality, leads to an underestimation of the cluster abundance by 30%, 20% and 15% at z=0, 0.5, 1 for M ~ [7 - 2.5 - 0.8] x 10^{14}Msun respectively ($ u = delta_c/sigma ~ 3$). We provide a re-calibration of the halo MF valid over 5 orders of magnitude in mass, 10^{10} < M/(Msun) < 10^{15}, that accurately describes its redshift evolution up to z=1. We explore the impact of this re-calibration on the determination of dark-energy, and conclude that using available fits may systematically bias the estimate of w by as much as 50% for medium-depth (z <= 1) surveys. MICE halo catalogues are publicly available at http://www.ice.cat/mice
We use the latest Planck constraints, and in particular constraints on the derived parameters (Hubble constant and age of the Universe) for the local universe and compare them with local measurements of the same quantities. We propose a way to quanti fy whether cosmological parameters constraints from two different experiments are in tension or not. Our statistic, T, is an evidence ratio and therefore can be interpreted with the widely used Jeffreys scale. We find that in the framework of the LCDM model, the Planck inferred two dimensional, joint, posterior distribution for the Hubble constant and age of the Universe is in strong tension with the local measurements; the odds being ~ 1:50. We explore several possibilities for explaining this tension and examine the consequences both in terms of unknown errors and deviations from the LCDM model. In some one-parameter LCDM model extensions, tension is reduced whereas in other extensions, tension is instead increased. In particular, small total neutrino masses are favored and a total neutrino mass above 0.15 eV makes the tension highly significant (odds ~ 1:150). A consequence of accepting this interpretation of the tension is that the degenerate neutrino hierarchy is highly disfavoured by cosmological data and the direct hierarchy is slightly favored over the inverse.
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا