اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدThe Price of Competition: Effect Size Heterogeneity Matters in High Dimensions
121
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
In high-dimensional linear regression, would increasing effect sizes always improve model selection, while maintaining all the other conditions unchanged (especially fixing the sparsity of regression coefficients)? In this paper, we answer this question in the textit{negative} in the regime of linear sparsity for the Lasso method, by introducing a new notion we term effect size heterogeneity. Roughly speaking, a regression coefficient vector has high effect size heterogeneity if its nonzero entries have significantly different magnitudes. From the viewpoint of this new measure, we prove that the false and true positive rates achieve the optimal trade-off uniformly along the Lasso path when this measure is maximal in a certain sense, and the worst trade-off is achieved when it is minimal in the sense that all nonzero effect sizes are roughly equal. Moreover, we demonstrate that the first false selection occurs much earlier when effect size heterogeneity is minimal than when it is maximal. The underlying cause of these two phenomena is, metaphorically speaking, the competition among variables with effect sizes of the same magnitude in entering the model. Taken together, our findings suggest that effect size heterogeneity shall serve as an important complementary measure to the sparsity of regression coefficients in the analysis of high-dimensional regression problems. Our proofs use techniques from approximate message passing theory as well as a novel technique for estimating the rank of the first false variable.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We consider the linear regression problem of estimating a $p$-dimensional vector $beta$ from $n$ observations $Y = X beta + W$, where $beta_j stackrel{text{i.i.d.}}{sim} pi$ for a real-valued distribution $pi$ with zero mean and unit variance, $X_{ij
} stackrel{text{i.i.d.}}{sim} mathcal{N}(0,1)$, and $W_istackrel{text{i.i.d.}}{sim} mathcal{N}(0, sigma^2)$. In the asymptotic regime where $n/p to delta$ and $ p/ sigma^2 to mathsf{snr}$ for two fixed constants $delta, mathsf{snr}in (0, infty)$ as $p to infty$, the limiting (normalized) minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) has been characterized by the MMSE of an associated single-letter (additive Gaussian scalar) channel. In this paper, we show that if the MMSE function of the single-letter channel converges to a step function, then the limiting MMSE of estimating $beta$ in the linear regression problem converges to a step function which jumps from $1$ to $0$ at a critical threshold. Moreover, we establish that the limiting mean-squared error of the (MSE-optimal) approximate message passing algorithm also converges to a step function with a larger threshold, providing evidence for the presence of a computational-statistical gap between the two thresholds.
Comparing probability distributions is an indispensable and ubiquitous task in machine learning and statistics. The most common way to compare a pair of Borel probability measures is to compute a metric between them, and by far the most widely used n
otions of metric are the Wasserstein metric and the total variation metric. The next most common way is to compute a divergence between them, and in this case almost every known divergences such as those of Kullback--Leibler, Jensen--Shannon, Renyi, and many more, are special cases of the $f$-divergence. Nevertheless these metrics and divergences may only be computed, in fact, are only defined, when the pair of probability measures are on spaces of the same dimension. How would one quantify, say, a KL-divergence between the uniform distribution on the interval $[-1,1]$ and a Gaussian distribution on $mathbb{R}^3$? We will show that, in a completely natural manner, various common notions of metrics and divergences give rise to a distance between Borel probability measures defined on spaces of different dimensions, e.g., one on $mathbb{R}^m$ and another on $mathbb{R}^n$ where $m, n$ are distinct, so as to give a meaningful answer to the previous question.
Logistic regression is used thousands of times a day to fit data, predict future outcomes, and assess the statistical significance of explanatory variables. When used for the purpose of statistical inference, logistic models produce p-values for the
regression coefficients by using an approximation to the distribution of the likelihood-ratio test. Indeed, Wilks theorem asserts that whenever we have a fixed number $p$ of variables, twice the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) $2Lambda$ is distributed as a $chi^2_k$ variable in the limit of large sample sizes $n$; here, $k$ is the number of variables being tested. In this paper, we prove that when $p$ is not negligible compared to $n$, Wilks theorem does not hold and that the chi-square approximation is grossly incorrect; in fact, this approximation produces p-values that are far too small (under the null hypothesis). Assume that $n$ and $p$ grow large in such a way that $p/nrightarrowkappa$ for some constant $kappa < 1/2$. We prove that for a class of logistic models, the LLR converges to a rescaled chi-square, namely, $2Lambda~stackrel{mathrm{d}}{rightarrow}~alpha(kappa)chi_k^2$, where the scaling factor $alpha(kappa)$ is greater than one as soon as the dimensionality ratio $kappa$ is positive. Hence, the LLR is larger than classically assumed. For instance, when $kappa=0.3$, $alpha(kappa)approx1.5$. In general, we show how to compute the scaling factor by solving a nonlinear system of two equations with two unknowns. Our mathematical arguments are involved and use techniques from approximate message passing theory, non-asymptotic random matrix theory and convex geometry. We also complement our mathematical study by showing that the new limiting distribution is accurate for finite sample sizes. Finally, all the results from this paper extend to some other regression models such as the probit regression model.
This paper studies the optimal rate of estimation in a finite Gaussian location mixture model in high dimensions without separation conditions. We assume that the number of components $k$ is bounded and that the centers lie in a ball of bounded radiu
s, while allowing the dimension $d$ to be as large as the sample size $n$. Extending the one-dimensional result of Heinrich and Kahn cite{HK2015}, we show that the minimax rate of estimating the mixing distribution in Wasserstein distance is $Theta((d/n)^{1/4} + n^{-1/(4k-2)})$, achieved by an estimator computable in time $O(nd^2+n^{5/4})$. Furthermore, we show that the mixture density can be estimated at the optimal parametric rate $Theta(sqrt{d/n})$ in Hellinger distance and provide a computationally efficient algorithm to achieve this rate in the special case of $k=2$. Both the theoretical and methodological development rely on a careful application of the method of moments. Central to our results is the observation that the information geometry of finite Gaussian mixtures is characterized by the moment tensors of the mixing distribution, whose low-rank structure can be exploited to obtain a sharp local entropy bound.
This paper studies the problem of high-dimensional multiple testing and sparse recovery from the perspective of sequential analysis. In this setting, the probability of error is a function of the dimension of the problem. A simple sequential testing
procedure is proposed. We derive necessary conditions for reliable recovery in the non-sequential setting and contrast them with sufficient conditions for reliable recovery using the proposed sequential testing procedure. Applications of the main results to several commonly encountered models show that sequential testing can be exponentially more sensitive to the difference between the null and alternative distributions (in terms of the dependence on dimension), implying that subtle cases can be much more reliably determined using sequential methods.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
