ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
In a recent comment, Ruth Signorell raises a number of issues that she considers to question the validity of our approach to determine mean free paths for electron scattering in liquid water and our comparison with the results on amorphous ice by Michaud, Wen, and Sanche. Here, we show that these critiques are unjustified, being either unfounded or based on misconceptions by the author of the comment. We nevertheless welcome the opportunity to further clarify certain aspects of our work that we did not discuss in detail in our letter.
The mean free paths of low-energy electrons in liquid water are of fundamental importance for modelling radiation damage and many related physico-chemical processes. Neither theoretical predictions nor experimental estimations have so far converged t
This is a reply to the comment from E. Amselem et al. on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150401 (2012), arXiv:1207.0059).
In this short note we reply to a comment by Callegaro et al. [1] (arXiv:2009.11709) that points out some weakness of the model of indeterministic physics that we proposed in Ref. [2] (Physical Review A, 100(6), p.062107), based on what we named finit
In this Reply, we respond to the above Comment. Our computation [Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 074512] only took into account pure QCD effects, arising from quark mass differences, so it is not surprising that there are discrepancies in isospin splittings a
The Authors reply to the Comment of Golub and Lamoreaux. The experimental limit on the neutron electric dipole moment remains unchanged from that previously announced.