ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
D. Borah and B. Karmakar in Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) have proposed an A4 flavoured linear seesaw model to realise light Dirac neutrinos. In this comment article, we show that some neutrino Yukawa interactions were missed in the model, thus implying that a different formula would be needed to determine the effective neutrino mass matrix, with significantly different results. Our result shows that, unlike stated in Phys. Lett. B789 (2019), that the inverted neutrino mass spectrum is not ruled out.
In this paper we reply to the comment presented in [1]. In that work the author raises several points about the geometric phase for neutrinos discussed in [2]. He affirms that the calculation is flawed due to incorrect application of the definition o
In the cross section for single-inclusive jet production in electron-nucleon collisions, the distribution of a quark in an electron appears at next-to-next-to-leading order. The numerical calculations in Ref. [1] were carried out using a perturbative
We offer a clarification of the significance of the indicated paper of H. Cheng. Chengs conclusions about the attractive nature of Casimir forces between parallel plates are valid beyond the particular model in which he derived them; they are likely
In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].
In this work, we present a comparative study of the three of the seesaw models, viz., type II, inverse and linear seesaw models, to investigate about light neutrino masses and mixings, flavour structure, neutrinoless double beta decay ($ 0 u beta bet