ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Most major planetary bodies in the solar system rotate in the same direction as their orbital motion: their spin is prograde. Theoretical studies to explain the direction as well as the magnitude of the spin vector have had mixed success. When the accreting building blocks are $sim$ km-size planetesimals -- as predicted by the classical model -- the accretion process is so symmetric that it cancels out prograde with retrograde spin contributions, rendering the net spin minute. For this reason, the currently-favored model for the origin of planetary rotation is the giant impact model, in which a single collision suffices to deliver a spin, which magnitude is close to the breakup rotation rate. However, the giant impact model does not naturally explain the preference for prograde spin. Similarly, an increasing number of spin-vector measurement of asteroids also shows that the spin vector of large (primordial) asteroids is not isotropic. Here, we re-assess the viability of smaller particles to bestow planetary bodies with a net spin, focusing on the pebble accretion model in which gas drag and gravity join forces to accrete small particles at a large cross section. Similar to the classical calculation for planetesimals, we integrate the pebble equation of motion and measure the angular momentum transfer at impact. We consider a variety of disk conditions and pebble properties and conduct our calculations in the limits of 2D (planar) and 3D (homogeneous) pebble distributions. We find that in certain regions of the parameter space the angular momentum transfer is significant, much larger than with planetesimals and on par with or exceeding the current spin of planetary bodies.
Pebble accretion is an emerging paradigm for the fast growth of planetary cores. Pebble flux and pebble sizes are the key parameters used in the pebble accretion models. We aim to derive the pebble sizes and fluxes from state-of-the-art dust coagulat
Context: Planet formation by pebble accretion is an alternative to planetesimal-driven core accretion. In this scenario, planets grow by accreting cm-to-m-sized pebbles instead of km-sized planetesimals. One of the main differences with planetesimal-
In the standard model of core accretion, the formation of giant planets occurs by two main processes: first, a massive core is formed by the accretion of solid material; then, when this core exceeds a critical value (typically greater than 10 Earth m
Context. The classical planetesimal accretion scenario for the formation of planets has recently evolved with the idea that pebbles, centimeter- to meter-sized icy grains migrating in protoplanetary disks, can control planetesimal and/or planetary gr
During their formation, planets form large, hot atmospheres due to the ongoing accretion of solids. It has been customary to assume that all solids end up at the center constituting a core of refractory materials, whereas the envelope remains metal-f