ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
An analytical model invoking variations in the charge-carrier density is used to generate magnetoresistance curves that are almost indistinguishable from those produced by sophisticated numerical models. This demonstrates that, though disorder is pivotal in causing linear magnetoresistance, the form of the magnetoresistance thus generated is insensitive to details of the disorder. Taken in conjunction with the temperature ($T$) dependence of the zero-field resistivity, realistic levels of disorder are shown to be sufficient to explain the linear magnetoresistance and field-$T$ resistance scaling observed in high-temperature pnictide and cuprate superconductors. Hence, though the $T$-linear zero-field resistance is a definite signature of the strange metal state of high-temperature superconductors, their linear magnetoresistance and its scaling is unlikely to be so.
Scaling laws express a systematic and universal simplicity among complex systems in nature. For example, such laws are of enormous significance in biology. Scaling relations are also important in the physical sciences. The seminal 1986 discovery of h
Recent photoemission data in the high temperature cuprate superconductor Bi2212 have been interpreted in terms of a sharp spectral peak with a temperature independent lifetime, whose weight strongly decreases upon heating. By a detailed analysis of t
We propose and show that the c-axis transport in high-temperature superconductors is controlled by the pseudogap energy and the c-axis resistivity satisfies a universal scaling law in the pseudogap phase. We derived approximately a scaling function f
By re-examining recently-published data from angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy we demonstrate that, in the superconducting region of the phase diagram, the pseudogap ground state is an arc metal. This scenario is consistent with results from
In conventional metals, electron-phonon coupling, or the phonon-mediated interaction between electrons, has long been known to be the pairing interaction responsible for the superconductivity. The strength of this interaction essentially determines t