اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدImproving High Contention OLTP Performance via Transaction Scheduling
77
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Research in transaction processing has made significant progress in improving the performance of multi-core in-memory transactional systems. However, the focus has mainly been on low-contention workloads. Modern transactional systems perform poorly on workloads with transactions accessing a few highly contended data items. We observe that most transactional workloads, including those with high contention, can be divided into clusters of data conflict-free transactions and a small set of residuals. In this paper, we introduce a new concurrency control protocol called Strife that leverages the above observation. Strife executes transactions in batches, where each batch is partitioned into clusters of conflict-free transactions and a small set of residual transactions. The conflict-free clusters are executed in parallel without any concurrency control, followed by executing the residual cluster either serially or with concurrency control. We present a low-overhead algorithm that partitions a batch of transactions into clusters that do not have cross-cluster conflicts and a small residual cluster. We evaluate Strife against the optimistic concurrency control protocol and several variants of two-phase locking, where the latter is known to perform better than other concurrency protocols under high contention, and show that Strife can improve transactional throughput by up to 2x. We also perform an in-depth micro-benchmark analysis to empirically characterize the performance and quality of our clustering algorithm
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Current main memory database system architectures are still challenged by high contention workloads and this challenge will continue to grow as the number of cores in processors continues to increase. These systems schedule transactions randomly acro
ss cores to maximize concurrency and to produce a uniform load across cores. Scheduling never considers potential conflicts. Performance could be improved if scheduling balanced between concurrency to maximize throughput and scheduling transactions linearly to avoid conflicts. In this paper, we present the design of several intelligent transaction scheduling algorithms that consider both potential transaction conflicts and concurrency. To incorporate reasoning about transaction conflicts, we develop a supervised machine learning model that estimates the probability of conflict. This model is incorporated into several scheduling algorithms. In addition, we integrate an unsupervised machine learning algorithm into an intelligent scheduling algorithm. We then empirically measure the performance impact of different scheduling algorithms on OLTP and social networking workloads. Our results show that, with appropriate settings, intelligent scheduling can increase throughput by 54% and reduce abort rate by 80% on a 20-core machine, relative to random scheduling. In summary, the paper provides preliminary evidence that intelligent scheduling significantly improves DBMS performance.
Although significant recent progress has been made in improving the multi-core scalability of high throughput transactional database systems, modern systems still fail to achieve scalable throughput for workloads involving frequent access to highly c
ontended data. Most of this inability to achieve high throughput is explained by the fundamental constraints involved in guaranteeing ACID --- the addition of cores results in more concurrent transactions accessing the same contended data for which access must be serialized in order to guarantee isolation. Thus, linear scalability for contended workloads is impossible. However, there exist flaws in many modern architectures that exacerbate their poor scalability, and result in throughput that is much worse than fundamentally required by the workload. In this paper we identify two prevalent design principles that limit the multi-core scalability of many (but not all) transactional database systems on contended workloads: the multi-purpose nature of execution threads in these systems, and the lack of advanced planning of data access. We demonstrate the deleterious results of these design principles by implementing a prototype system, ORTHRUS, that is motivated by the principles of separation of database component functionality and advanced planning of transactions. We find that these two principles alone result in significantly improved scalability on high-contention workloads, and an order of magnitude increase in throughput for a non-trivial subset of these contended workloads.
Transaction logging is an essential constituent to guarantee the atomicity and durability in online transaction processing (OLTP) systems. It always has a considerable impact on performance, especially in an in-memory database system. Conventional im
plementations of logging rely heavily on a centralized design, which guarantees the correctness of recovery by enforcing a total order of all operations such as log sequence number (LSN) allocation, log persistence, transaction committing and recovering. This strict sequential constraint seriously limits the scalability and parallelism of transaction logging and recovery, especially in the multi-core hardware environment. In this paper, we define recoverability for transaction logging and demonstrate its correctness for crash recovery. Based on recoverability, we propose a recoverable logging scheme named Poplar, which enables scalable and parallel log processing by easing the restrictions. Its main advantages are that (1) Poplar enables the parallel log persistence on multiple storage devices; (2) it replaces the centralized LSN allocation by calculating a partially ordered sequence number in a distributed manner, which allows log records to only track RAW and WAW dependencies among transactions; (3) it only demands transactions with RAW dependencies to be committed in serial order; (4) Poplar can concurrently restore a consistent database state based on the partially constrained logs after a crash. Experimental results show that Poplar scales well with the increase of IO devices and outperforms other logging approaches on both SSDs and emulated non-volatile memory.
Concurrency control algorithms are key determinants of the performance of in-memory databases. Existing algorithms are designed to work well for certain workloads. For example, optimistic concurrency control (OCC) is better than two-phase-locking (2P
L) under low contention, while the converse is true under high contention. To adapt to different workloads, prior works mix or switch between a few known algorithms using manual insights or simple heuristics. We propose a learning-based framework that instead explicitly optimizes concurrency control via offline training to maximize performance. Instead of choosing among a small number of known algorithms, our approach searches in a policy space of fine-grained actions, resulting in novel algorithms that can outperform existing algorithms by specializing to a given workload. We build Polyjuice based on our learning framework and evaluate it against several existing algorithms. Under different configurations of TPC-C and TPC-E, Polyjuice can achieve throughput numbers higher than the best of existing algorithms by 15% to 56%.
A blockchain is an append-only linked-list of blocks, which is maintained at each participating node. Each block records a set of transactions and their associated metadata. Blockchain transactions act on the identical ledger data stored at each node
. Blockchain was first perceived by Satoshi Nakamoto as a peer-to-peer digital-commodity (also known as crypto-currency) exchange system. Blockchains received traction due to their inherent property of immutability-once a block is accepted, it cannot be reverted.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
