اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدAlgorithms for Noisy Broadcast under Erasures
84
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
The noisy broadcast model was first studied in [Gallager, TranInf88] where an $n$-character input is distributed among $n$ processors, so that each processor receives one input bit. Computation proceeds in rounds, where in each round each processor broadcasts a single character, and each reception is corrupted independently at random with some probability $p$. [Gallager, TranInf88] gave an algorithm for all processors to learn the input in $O(loglog n)$ rounds with high probability. Later, a matching lower bound of $Omega(loglog n)$ was given in [Goyal, Kindler, Saks; SICOMP08]. We study a relaxed version of this model where each reception is erased and replaced with a `? independently with probability $p$. In this relaxed model, we break past the lower bound of [Goyal, Kindler, Saks; SICOMP08] and obtain an $O(log^* n)$-round algorithm for all processors to learn the input with high probability. We also show an $O(1)$-round algorithm for the same problem when the alphabet size is $Omega(mathrm{poly}(n))$.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Differentially private algorithms protect individuals in data analysis scenarios by ensuring that there is only a weak correlation between the existence of the user in the data and the result of the analysis. Dynamic graph algorithms maintain the sol
ution to a problem (e.g., a matching) on an evolving input, i.e., a graph where nodes or edges are inserted or deleted over time. They output the value of the solution after each update operation, i.e., continuously. We study (event-level and user-level) differentially private algorithms for graph problems under continual observation, i.e., differentially private dynamic graph algorithms. We present event-level private algorithms for partially dynamic counting-based problems such as triangle count that improve the additive error by a polynomial factor (in the length $T$ of the update sequence) on the state of the art, resulting in the first algorithms with additive error polylogarithmic in $T$. We also give $varepsilon$-differentially private and partially dynamic algorithms for minimum spanning tree, minimum cut, densest subgraph, and maximum matching. The additive error of our improved MST algorithm is $O(W log^{3/2}T / varepsilon)$, where $W$ is the maximum weight of any edge, which, as we show, is tight up to a $(sqrt{log T} / varepsilon)$-factor. For the other problems, we present a partially-dynamic algorithm with multiplicative error $(1+beta)$ for any constant $beta > 0$ and additive error $O(W log(nW) log(T) / (varepsilon beta) )$. Finally, we show that the additive error for a broad class of dynamic graph algorithms with user-level privacy must be linear in the value of the output solutions range.
Metric based comparison operations such as finding maximum, nearest and farthest neighbor are fundamental to studying various clustering techniques such as $k$-center clustering and agglomerative hierarchical clustering. These techniques crucially re
ly on accurate estimation of pairwise distance between records. However, computing exact features of the records, and their pairwise distances is often challenging, and sometimes not possible. We circumvent this challenge by leveraging weak supervision in the form of a comparison oracle that compares the relative distance between the queried points such as `Is point u closer to v or w closer to x?. However, it is possible that some queries are easier to answer than others using a comparison oracle. We capture this by introducing two different noise models called adversarial and probabilistic noise. In this paper, we study various problems that include finding maximum, nearest/farthest neighbor search under these noise models. Building upon the techniques we develop for these comparison operations, we give robust algorithms for k-center clustering and agglomerative hierarchical clustering. We prove that our algorithms achieve good approximation guarantees with a high probability and analyze their query complexity. We evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of our techniques empirically on various real-world datasets.
begin{abstract} The frequencies of the elements in a data stream are an important statistical measure and the task of estimating them arises in many applications within data analysis and machine learning. Two of the most popular algorithms for this p
roblem, Count-Min and Count-Sketch, are widely used in practice. In a recent work [Hsu et al., ICLR19], it was shown empirically that augmenting Count-Min and Count-Sketch with a machine learning algorithm leads to a significant reduction of the estimation error. The experiments were complemented with an analysis of the expected error incurred by Count-Min (both the standard and the augmented version) when the input frequencies follow a Zipfian distribution. Although the authors established that the learned version of Count-Min has lower estimation error than its standard counterpart, their analysis of the standard Count-Min algorithm was not tight. Moreover, they provided no similar analysis for Count-Sketch. In this paper we resolve these problems. First, we provide a simple tight analysis of the expected error incurred by Count-Min. Second, we provide the first error bounds for both the standard and the augmented version of Count-Sketch. These bounds are nearly tight and again demonstrate an improved performance of the learned version of Count-Sketch. In addition to demonstrating tight gaps between the aforementioned algorithms, we believe that our bounds for the standa
We consider the classic problem of scheduling jobs with precedence constraints on a set of identical machines to minimize the makespan objective function. Understanding the exact approximability of the problem when the number of machines is a constan
t is a well-known question in scheduling theory. Indeed, an outstanding open problem from the classic book of Garey and Johnson asks whether this problem is NP-hard even in the case of 3 machines and unit-length jobs. In a recent breakthrough, Levey and Rothvoss gave a $(1+epsilon)$-approximation algorithm, which runs in nearly quasi-polynomial time, for the case when job have unit lengths. However, a substantially more difficult case where jobs have arbitrary processing lengths has remained open. We make progress on this more general problem. We show that there exists a $(1+epsilon)$-approximation algorithm (with similar running time as that of Levey and Rothvoss) for the non-migratory setting: when every job has to be scheduled entirely on a single machine, but within a machine the job need not be scheduled during consecutive time steps. Further, we also show that our algorithmic framework generalizes to another classic scenario where, along with the precedence constraints, the jobs also have communication delay constraints. Both of these fundamental problems are highly relevant to the practice of datacenter scheduling.
Consider the following abstract coin tossing problem: Given a set of $n$ coins with unknown biases, find the most biased coin using a minimal number of coin tosses. This is a common abstraction of various exploration problems in theoretical computer
science and machine learning and has been studied extensively over the years. In particular, algorithms with optimal sample complexity (number of coin tosses) have been known for this problem for quite some time. Motivated by applications to processing massive datasets, we study the space complexity of solving this problem with optimal number of coin tosses in the streaming model. In this model, the coins are arriving one by one and the algorithm is only allowed to store a limited number of coins at any point -- any coin not present in the memory is lost and can no longer be tossed or compared to arriving coins. Prior algorithms for the coin tossing problem with optimal sample complexity are based on iterative elimination of coins which inherently require storing all the coins, leading to memory-inefficient streaming algorithms. We remedy this state-of-affairs by presenting a series of improved streaming algorithms for this problem: we start with a simple algorithm which require storing only $O(log{n})$ coins and then iteratively refine it further and further, leading to algorithms with $O(loglog{(n)})$ memory, $O(log^*{(n)})$ memory, and finally a one that only stores a single extra coin in memory -- the same exact space needed to just store the best coin throughout the stream. Furthermore, we extend our algorithms to the problem of finding the $k$ most biased coins as well as other exploration problems such as finding top-$k$ elements using noisy comparisons or finding an $epsilon$-best arm in stochastic multi-armed bandits, and obtain efficient streaming algorithms for these problems.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
