ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Let $phi_H^r(n)$ be the smallest integer such that, for all $r$-graphs $G$ on $n$ vertices, the edge set $E(G)$ can be partitioned into at most $phi_H^r(n)$ parts, of which every part either is a single edge or forms an $r$-graph isomorphic to $H$. The function $phi^2_H(n)$ has been well studied in literature, but for the case $rge 3$, the problem that determining the value of $phi_H^r(n)$ is widely open. Sousa (2010) gave an asymptotic value of $phi_H^r(n)$ when $H$ is an $r$-graph with exactly 2 edges, and determined the exact value of $phi_H^r(n)$ in some special cases. In this paper, we first give the exact value of $phi_H^r(n)$ when $H$ is an $r$-graph with exactly 2 edges, which improves Sousas result. Second we determine the exact value of $phi_H^r(n)$ when $H$ is an $r$-graph consisting of exactly $k$ independent edges.
It is known that for $Omega subset mathbb{R}^{2}$ an unbounded convex domain and $H>0$, there exists a graph $Gsubset mathbb{R}^{3}$ of constant mean curvature $H$ over $Omega $ with $partial G=$ $partial Omega $ if and only if $Omega $ is included i
The 4D Eigenvector 1 parameter space was introduced seven years ago as an attempt at multiwavelength spectroscopic representation of quasars. It appears to be the most effective diagnostic space for unifying the diversity of broad line AGN. This prog
The ErdH{o}s-Simonovits stability theorem states that for all epsilon >0 there exists alpha >0 such that if G is a K_{r+1}-free graph on n vertices with e(G) > ex(n,K_{r+1}) - alpha n^2, then one can remove epsilon n^2 edges from G to obtain an r-par
Let $A(G)$ be the adjacency matrix of a graph $G$ with $lambda_{1}(G)$, $lambda_{2}(G)$, ..., $lambda_{n}(G)$ being its eigenvalues in non-increasing order. Call the number $S_k(G):=sum_{i=1}^{n}lambda_{i}^k(G) (k=0,1,...,n-1)$ the $k$th spectral mom
By using the Szemeredi Regularity Lemma, Alon and Sudakov recently extended the classical Andrasfai-Erd~os-Sos theorem to cover general graphs. We prove, without using the Regularity Lemma, that the following stronger statement is true. Given any (r-