اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدMultivariate convex regression: global risk bounds and adaptation
60
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We study the problem of estimating a multivariate convex function defined on a convex body in a regression setting with random design. We are interested in optimal rates of convergence under a squared global continuous $l_2$ loss in the multivariate setting $(dgeq 2)$. One crucial fact is that the minimax risks depend heavily on the shape of the support of the regression function. It is shown that the global minimax risk is on the order of $n^{-2/(d+1)}$ when the support is sufficiently smooth, but that the rate $n^{-4/(d+4)}$ is when the support is a polytope. Such differences in rates are due to difficulties in estimating the regression function near the boundary of smooth regions. We then study the natural bounded least squares estimators (BLSE): we show that the BLSE nearly attains the optimal rates of convergence in low dimensions, while suffering rate-inefficiency in high dimensions. We show that the BLSE adapts nearly parametrically to polyhedral functions when the support is polyhedral in low dimensions by a local entropy method. We also show that the boundedness constraint cannot be dropped when risk is assessed via continuous $l_2$ loss. Given rate sub-optimality of the BLSE in higher dimensions, we further study rate-efficient adaptive estimation procedures. Two general model selection methods are developed to provide sieved adaptive estimators (SAE) that achieve nearly optimal rates of convergence for particular regular classes of convex functions, while maintaining nearly parametric rate-adaptivity to polyhedral functions in arbitrary dimensions. Interestingly, the uniform boundedness constraint is unnecessary when risks are measured in discrete $l_2$ norms.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
In high-dimensional regression, we attempt to estimate a parameter vector ${boldsymbol beta}_0in{mathbb R}^p$ from $nlesssim p$ observations ${(y_i,{boldsymbol x}_i)}_{ile n}$ where ${boldsymbol x}_iin{mathbb R}^p$ is a vector of predictors and $y_i$
is a response variable. A well-estabilished approach uses convex regularizers to promote specific structures (e.g. sparsity) of the estimate $widehat{boldsymbol beta}$, while allowing for practical algorithms. Theoretical analysis implies that convex penalization schemes have nearly optimal estimation properties in certain settings. However, in general the gaps between statistically optimal estimation (with unbounded computational resources) and convex methods are poorly understood. We show that, in general, a large gap exists between the best performance achieved by emph{any convex regularizer} and the optimal statistical error. Remarkably, we demonstrate that this gap is generic as soon as we try to incorporate very simple structural information about the empirical distribution of the entries of ${boldsymbol beta}_0$. Our results follow from a detailed study of standard Gaussian designs, a setting that is normally considered particularly friendly to convex regularization schemes such as the Lasso. We prove a lower bound on the estimation error achieved by any convex regularizer which is invariant under permutations of the coordinates of its argument. This bound is expected to be generally tight, and indeed we prove tightness under certain conditions. Further, it implies a gap with respect to Bayes-optimal estimation that can be precisely quantified and persists if the prior distribution of the signal ${boldsymbol beta}_0$ is known to the statistician. Our results provide rigorous evidence towards a broad conjecture regarding computational-statistical gaps in high-dimensional estimation.
The processes of the averaged regression quantiles and of their modifications provide useful tools in the regression models when the covariates are not fully under our control. As an application we mention the probabilistic risk assessment in the sit
uation when the return depends on some exogenous variables. The processes enable to evaluate the expected $alpha$-shortfall ($0leqalphaleq 1$) and other measures of the risk, recently generally accepted in the financial literature, but also help to measure the risk in environment analysis and elsewhere.
Multivariate linear regressions are widely used statistical tools in many applications to model the associations between multiple related responses and a set of predictors. To infer such associations, it is often of interest to test the structure of
the regression coefficients matrix, and the likelihood ratio test (LRT) is one of the most popular approaches in practice. Despite its popularity, it is known that the classical $chi^2$ approximations for LRTs often fail in high-dimensional settings, where the dimensions of responses and predictors $(m,p)$ are allowed to grow with the sample size $n$. Though various corrected LRTs and other test statistics have been proposed in the literature, the fundamental question of when the classic LRT starts to fail is less studied, an answer to which would provide insights for practitioners, especially when analyzing data with $m/n$ and $p/n$ small but not negligible. Moreover, the power performance of the LRT in high-dimensional data analysis remains underexplored. To address these issues, the first part of this work gives the asymptotic boundary where the classical LRT fails and develops the corrected limiting distribution of the LRT for a general asymptotic regime. The second part of this work further studies the test power of the LRT in the high-dimensional setting. The result not only advances the current understanding of asymptotic behavior of the LRT under alternative hypothesis, but also motivates the development of a power-enhanced LRT. The third part of this work considers the setting with $p>n$, where the LRT is not well-defined. We propose a two-step testing procedure by first performing dimension reduction and then applying the proposed LRT. Theoretical properties are developed to ensure the validity of the proposed method. Numerical studies are also presented to demonstrate its good performance.
In this paper, we develop modifi
We consider the problem of estimating the predictive density of future observations from a non-parametric regression model. The density estimators are evaluated under Kullback--Leibler divergence and our focus is on establishing the exact asymptotics
of minimax risk in the case of Gaussian errors. We derive the convergence rate and constant for minimax risk among Bayesian predictive densities under Gaussian priors and we show that this minimax risk is asymptotically equivalent to that among all density estimators.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
