ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
The recent paper by Jeltema & Profumo(2014) claims that contributions from ion{K}{18} and ion{Cl}{17} lines can explain the unidentified emission line found by Bulbul et al 2014 and also by Boyarsky et al, 2014a, 2014b. We show that their analysis relies upon incorrect atomic data and inconsistent spectroscopic modeling. We address these points and summarize in the appendix the correct values for the relevant atomic data from AtomDB.
We present a comprehensive search for the 3.5 keV line, using $sim$51 Ms of archival Chandra observations peering through the Milky Ways Dark Matter Halo from across the entirety of the sky, gathered via the Chandra Source Catalog Release 2.0. We con
I show that model dependencies in the analysis by Dessert, Rodd & Safdi (2020) relax their claimed constraint by a factor of ~20. After including conservative model choices, the derived limits are comparable to or slightly better than limits from pre
The reported observations of an unidentified X-ray line feature at $sim$3.5 keV have driven a lively discussion about its possible dark matter origin. Motivated by this, we have measured the emph{K}-shell X-ray spectra of highly ionized bare sulfur i
High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy with Hitomi was expected to resolve the origin of the faint unidentified E=3.5 keV emission line reported in several low-resolution studies of various massive systems, such as galaxies and clusters, including the Pe
Context. Recent findings of line emission at 3.5 keV in both individual and stacked X-ray spectra of galaxy clusters have been speculated to have dark matter origin. Aims. If the origin is indeed dark matter, the emission line is expected to be detec