اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدIs GBT 1355+5439 a dark galaxy?
251
0
0.0
(
0
)
تأليف
T.A. Oosterloo
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We present HI imaging of GBT 1355+5439 performed with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope. This is a dark HI object recently discovered close to the nearby galaxy M101. We find GBT 1355+5439 to be an HI cloud 5x3 arcmin in size. The total HI image and the kinematics show that the cloud consists of condensations that have small (~10 km/s) motions with respect to each other. The column densities of the HI are low; the observed peak value is 7.1x10^{19} cm^{-2}. The velocity field shows a mild velocity gradient over the body of GBT 1355+5439, possibly due to rotation, but it may also indicate large-scale radial motions. Although our data are limited in sensitivity, at all positions the HI velocity dispersion is higher than 5 km/s and no narrow, cold, HI component is seen. Because its distance is not known, we considered various possibilities for the nature of GBT 1355+5439. Both the scenarios that it is a tidal remnant near M101 and that it is a dark dwarf companion of M101 meet difficulties. Neither do the data fit the properties of known compact High-Velocity Clouds in the Galactic halo exactly, but we cannot entirely exclude this option and deeper observations are required. We also considered the possibility that GBT 1355+5439 is a gas-rich dark minihalo in the outer regions of the Local Group. Interestingly, it would then have similar properties as the clouds of a proposed Local Group population recently found in the ALFALFA survey. In this case, the HI mass of GBT 1355+5439 would be about a few times 10^5 Msol, its size about 1 kpc, and the dynamical mass M_dyn > 5x10^7 Msol. However, if GBT 1355+5439 is a dark Local Group object, the internal kinematics of the HI appears to be different from that of gas-dominated, almost dark galaxies of similar size.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
The similarity between the distributions of spins for galaxies ($lambda_{rm g}$) and for dark-matter haloes ($lambda_{rm h}$), indicated both by simulations and observations, is naively interpreted as a one-to-one correlation between the spins of a g
alaxy and its host halo. This is used to predict galaxy sizes in semi-analytic models via $R_{rm e}simeqlambda_{rm h} R_{rm v}$, with $R_{rm e}$ the half-mass radius of the galaxy and $R_{rm v}$ the halo radius. Utilizing two different suites of zoom-in cosmological simulations, we find that $lambda_{rm g}$ and $lambda_{rm h}$ are in fact only barely correlated, especially at $zgeq 1$. A general smearing of this correlation is expected based on the different spin histories, where the more recently accreted baryons through streams gain and then lose significant angular momentum compared to the gradually accumulated dark matter. Expecting the spins of baryons and dark matter to be correlated at accretion into $R_{rm v}$, the null correlation at the end reflects an anti-correlation between $lambda_{rm g}/lambda_{rm h}$ and $lambda_{rm h}$, which can partly arise from mergers and a compact star-forming phase that many galaxies undergo. On the other hand, the halo and galaxy spin vectors tend to be aligned, with a median $costheta=0.6$-0.7 between galaxy and halo, consistent with instreaming within a preferred plane. The galaxy spin is better correlated with the spin of the inner halo, but this largely reflects the effect of the baryons on the halo. Following the null spin correlation, $lambda_{rm h}$ is not a useful proxy for $R_{rm e}$. While our simulations reproduce a general relation of the sort $R_{rm e}=AR_{rm vir}$, in agreement with observational estimates, the relation becomes tighter with $A=0.02(c/10)^{-0.7}$, where $c$ is the halo concentration, which in turn introduces a dependence on mass and redshift.
Due to the peculiar properties of ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs), understanding their origin presents a major challenge. Previous X-ray studies demonstrated that the bulk of UDGs lack substantial X-ray emission, implying that they reside in low-mass d
ark matter halos. This result, in concert with other observational and theoretical studies, pointed out that most UDGs belong to the class of dwarf galaxies. However, a subset of UDGs is believed to host a large population of globular clusters (GCs), which is indicative of massive dark matter halos. This, in turn, hints that some UDGs may be failed $L_{star}$ galaxies. In this work, I present Chandra and XMM-Newton observations of two archetypal UDGs, Dragonfly 44 and DF X1, and I constrain their dark matter halo mass based on the X-ray emission originating from hot gaseous emission and from the population of low-mass X-ray binaries residing in GCs. Both Dragonfly 44 and DF X1 remain undetected in X-rays. The upper limits on the X-ray emission exclude the possibility that these galaxies reside in massive ($M_{rm vir} gtrsim 5times10^{11} rm{M_{odot}}$) dark matter halos, suggesting that they are not failed $L_{star}$ galaxies. These results demonstrate that even these iconic UDGs resemble to dwarf galaxies with $M_{rm vir} lesssim 10^{11} rm{M_{odot}}$, implying that UDGs represent a single galaxy population.
We develop a simple yet comprehensive method to distinguish the underlying drivers of galaxy quenching, using the clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing of red and blue galaxies in SDSS. Building on the iHOD framework developed by Zu & Mandelbaum (2015
a), we consider two quenching scenarios: 1) a halo quenching model in which halo mass is the sole driver for turning off star formation in both centrals and satellites; and 2) a hybrid quenching model in which the quenched fraction of galaxies depends on their stellar mass while the satellite quenching has an extra dependence on halo mass. The two best-fit models describe the red galaxy clustering and lensing equally well, but halo quenching provides significantly better fits to the blue galaxies above $10^{11} M_odot/h^2$. The halo quenching model also correctly predicts the average halo mass of the red and blue centrals, showing excellent agreement with the direct weak lensing measurements of locally brightest galaxies. Models in which quenching is not tied to halo mass, including an age-matching model in which galaxy colour depends on halo age at fixed $M_*$, fail to reproduce the observed halo mass for massive blue centrals. We find similar critical halo masses responsible for the quenching of centrals and satellites (~$1.5times10^{12} Modot/h^2$), hinting at a uniform quenching mechanism for both, e.g., the virial shock-heating of infalling gas. The success of the iHOD halo quenching model provides strong evidence that the physical mechanism that quenches star formation in galaxies is tied principally to the masses of their dark matter halos rather than the properties of their stellar components.
We explore the relation between diffuse intracluster light (central galaxy included) and the galaxy cluster (baryonic and dark) matter distribution using a sample of 528 clusters at $0.2leq z leq 0.35$ found in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dat
a. The surface brightness of the diffuse light shows an increasing dependence on cluster total mass at larger radius, and appears to be self-similar with a universal radial dependence after scaling by cluster radius. We also compare the diffuse light radial profiles to the cluster (baryonic and dark) matter distribution measured through weak lensing and find them to be comparable. The IllustrisTNG galaxy formation simulation, TNG300, offers further insight into the connection between diffuse stellar mass and cluster matter distributions -- the simulation radial profile of the diffuse stellar component does not have a similar slope with the total cluster matter content, although that of the cluster satellite galaxies does. Regardless of the radial trends, the amount of diffuse stellar mass has a low-scatter scaling relation with clusters total mass in the simulation, out-performing the total stellar mass of cluster satellite galaxies. We conclude that there is no consistent evidence yet on whether or not diffuse light is a faithful radial tracer of the cluster matter distribution. Nevertheless, both observational and simulation results reveal that diffuse light is an excellent indicator of the clusters total mass.
Andromeda XXI (And XXI) has been proposed as a dwarf spheroidal galaxy with a central dark matter density that is lower than expected in the Standard $Lambda$ Cold Dark Matter ($Lambda$CDM) cosmology. In this work, we present dynamical observations f
or 77 member stars in this system, more than doubling previous studies to determine whether this galaxy is truly a low density outlier. We measure a systemic velocity of $v_r=-363.4pm1.0,{rm kms}^{-1}$ and a velocity dispersion of $sigma_v=6.1^{+1.0}_{-0.9},{rm kms}^{-1}$, consistent with previous work and within $1sigma$ of predictions made within the modified Newtonian dynamics framework. We also measure the metallicity of our member stars from their spectra, finding a mean value of ${rm [Fe/H]}=-1.7pm0.1$~dex. We model the dark matter density profile of And~XXI using an improved version of GravSphere, finding a central density of $rho_{rm DM}({rm 150 pc})=2.7_{-1.7}^{+2.7} times 10^7 ,{rm M_odot,kpc^{-3}}$ at 68% confidence, and a density at two half light radii of $rho_{rm DM}({rm 1.75 kpc})=0.9_{-0.2}^{+0.3} times 10^5 ,{rm M_odot,kpc^{-3}}$ at 68% confidence. These are both a factor ${sim}3-5$ lower than the densities expected from abundance matching in $Lambda$CDM. We show that this cannot be explained by `dark matter heating since And~XXI had too little star formation to significantly lower its inner dark matter density, while dark matter heating only acts on the profile inside the half light radius. However, And~XXIs low density can be accommodated within $Lambda$CDM if it experienced extreme tidal stripping (losing $>95%$ of its mass), or if it inhabits a low concentration halo on a plunging orbit that experienced repeated tidal shocks.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
