اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدAlberg and Miller Reply to arXiv:arXiv:1206.3671
31
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
In a recent Comment [arXiv:1206.3671] on our calculation of the pion contributions to the self-energy of the nucleon [arXiv:1201.4184], Ji, Melnitchouk and Thomas (JMT) correctly state that we obtain the same result as given by the pseudovector (PV) theory. We point out that this result is expected by the equivalence theorem, since our pion-nucleon effective theory puts the intermediate nucleon on its mass shell. We make no claim that pseudoscalar (PS) and pseudovector interactions are equivalent in general. JMT also argue that our theory will not give the correct PV result for the pion momentum distribution $f^N_{pi}$. We note that the discrepancies are much smaller than the uncertainties due to $pi N$ form factors. To summarize, nothing in the Comment by JMT changes the conclusions or numerical results of our work in any substantive way.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We offer a brief response to the criticism put forward by Pavon Valderrama about our recent paper on How (not) to renormalize integral equations with singular potentials in effective field theory.
We point out that after presenting our results on high $n$-$p$ momentum sensitivity of the $(d,p)$ cross sections in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 162502 (2016)] the last paragraph of our Letter refers to a need of going beyond the leading order of Weinberg
state treatment. This task could be achieved by using any method that can provide exact solution of the three-body problem. Deltuva [arXiv:1806.00298] uses Faddeev equations to study the NN-model dependence of the $(d,p)$ cross sections. His results are consistent with a new study performed at Surrey which is undergoing a reviewing process at Physical Review C. Both studies discuss the $n$-$p$ sensitivity within three-body $n+p+A$ models with $NN$-independent $N$-$A$ optical potentials. The sensitivity may reappear in many-body treatment of $(d,p)$ reactions, for example, due to the threshold position dependence.
Recent extensive data from the beam energy scan of the STAR collaboration at BNL-RHIC provide the basis for a detailed update for the universal behavior of the strangeness suppression factor gamma_s as function of the initial entropy density, as prop
osed in our recent paper [1]. [1] P. Castorina, S. Plumari and H. Satz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E26 (2017) 1750081 (arXiv:1709.02706)
We reply to the recent criticism by Garriga and Tanaka of our proposal that quantum gravitational loop corrections may lead to a secular screening of the effective cosmological constant. Their argument rests upon a renormalization scheme in which the
composite operator $(R sqrt{-g} - 4 Lambda sqrt{-g} )_{rm ren}$ is defined to be the trace of the renormalized field equations. Although this is a peculiar prescription, we show that it {it does not preclude secular screening}. Moreover, we show that a constant Ricci scalar {it does not even classically} imply a constant expansion rate. Other important points are: (1) the quantity $R_{rm ren}$ of Garriga and Tanaka is neither a properly defined composite operator, nor is it constant; (2) gauge dependence does not render a Greens function devoid of physical content; (3) scalar models on a non-dynamical de Sitter background (for which there is no gauge issue) can induce arbitrarily large secular contributions to the stress tensor; (4) the same secular corrections appear in observable quantities in quantum gravity; and (5) the prospects seem good for deriving a simple stochastic formulation of quantum gravity in which the leading secular effects can be summed and for which the expectation values of even complicated, gauge invariant operators can be computed at leading order.
In this Reply, we respond to the above Comment. Our computation [Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 074512] only took into account pure QCD effects, arising from quark mass differences, so it is not surprising that there are discrepancies in isospin splittings a
nd in the Sigma - Lambda mixing angle. We expect that these discrepancies will be smaller in a full calculation incorporating QED effects.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
