اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدOn the Ramsey number of the triangle and the cube
119
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
The Ramsey number r(K_3,Q_n) is the smallest integer N such that every red-blue colouring of the edges of the complete graph K_N contains either a red n-dimensional hypercube, or a blue triangle. Almost thirty years ago, Burr and ErdH{o}s conjectured that r(K_3,Q_n) = 2^{n+1} - 1 for every n in N, but the first non-trivial upper bound was obtained only recently, by Conlon, Fox, Lee and Sudakov, who proved that r(K_3,Q_n) le 7000 cdot 2^n. Here we show that r(K_3,Q_n) = (1 + o(1)) 2^{n+1} as n to infty.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
The areas of Ramsey theory and random graphs have been closely linked ever since ErdH{o}s famous proof in 1947 that the diagonal Ramsey numbers $R(k)$ grow exponentially in $k$. In the early 1990s, the triangle-free process was introduced as a model
which might potentially provide good lower bounds for the off-diagonal Ramsey numbers $R(3,k)$. In this model, edges of $K_n$ are introduced one-by-one at random and added to the graph if they do not create a triangle; the resulting final (random) graph is denoted $G_{n,triangle}$. In 2009, Bohman succeeded in following this process for a positive fraction of its duration, and thus obtained a second proof of Kims celebrated result that $R(3,k) = Theta big( k^2 / log k big)$. In this paper we improve the results of both Bohman and Kim, and follow the triangle-free process all the way to its asymptotic end. In particular, we shall prove that $$ebig( G_{n,triangle} big) ,=, left( frac{1}{2sqrt{2}} + o(1) right) n^{3/2} sqrt{log n },$$ with high probability as $n to infty$. We also obtain several pseudorandom properties of $G_{n,triangle}$, and use them to bound its independence number, which gives as an immediate corollary $$R(3,k) , ge , left( frac{1}{4} - o(1) right) frac{k^2}{log k}.$$ This significantly improves Kims lower bound, and is within a factor of $4 + o(1)$ of the best known upper bound, proved by Shearer over 25 years ago.
For a fixed set of positive integers $R$, we say $mathcal{H}$ is an $R$-uniform hypergraph, or $R$-graph, if the cardinality of each edge belongs to $R$. An $R$-graph $mathcal{H}$ is emph{covering} if every vertex pair of $mathcal{H}$ is contained in
some hyperedge. For a graph $G=(V,E)$, a hypergraph $mathcal{H}$ is called a textit{Berge}-$G$, denoted by $BG$, if there exists an injection $f: E(G) to E(mathcal{H})$ such that for every $e in E(G)$, $e subseteq f(e)$. In this note, we define a new type of Ramsey number, namely the emph{cover Ramsey number}, denoted as $hat{R}^R(BG_1, BG_2)$, as the smallest integer $n_0$ such that for every covering $R$-uniform hypergraph $mathcal{H}$ on $n geq n_0$ vertices and every $2$-edge-coloring (blue and red) of $mathcal{H}$ , there is either a blue Berge-$G_1$ or a red Berge-$G_2$ subhypergraph. We show that for every $kgeq 2$, there exists some $c_k$ such that for any finite graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$, $R(G_1, G_2) leq hat{R}^{[k]}(BG_1, BG_2) leq c_k cdot R(G_1, G_2)^3$. Moreover, we show that for each positive integer $d$ and $k$, there exists a constant $c = c(d,k)$ such that if $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices with maximum degree at most $d$, then $hat{R}^{[k]}(BG,BG) leq cn$.
The size-Ramsey number of a graph $F$ is the smallest number of edges in a graph $G$ with the Ramsey property for $F$, that is, with the property that any 2-colouring of the edges of $G$ contains a monochromatic copy of $F$. We prove that the size-Ra
msey number of the grid graph on $ntimes n$ vertices is bounded from above by $n^{3+o(1)}$.
The Ramsey number r(K_s,Q_n) is the smallest positive integer N such that every red-blue colouring of the edges of the complete graph K_N on N vertices contains either a red n-dimensional hypercube, or a blue clique on s vertices. Answering a questio
n of Burr and ErdH{o}s from 1983, and improving on recent results of Conlon, Fox, Lee and Sudakov, and of the current authors, we show that r(K_s,Q_n) = (s-1) (2^n - 1) + 1 for every s in N and every sufficiently large n in N.
In 1967, ErdH{o}s asked for the greatest chromatic number, $f(n)$, amongst all $n$-vertex, triangle-free graphs. An observation of ErdH{o}s and Hajnal together with Shearers classical upper bound for the off-diagonal Ramsey number $R(3, t)$ shows tha
t $f(n)$ is at most $(2 sqrt{2} + o(1)) sqrt{n/log n}$. We improve this bound by a factor $sqrt{2}$, as well as obtaining an analogous bound on the list chromatic number which is tight up to a constant factor. A bound in terms of the number of edges that is similarly tight follows, and these results confirm a conjecture of Cames van Batenburg, de Joannis de Verclos, Kang, and Pirot.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
