اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدMetric Extension Operators, Vertex Sparsifiers and Lipschitz Extendability
169
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We study vertex cut and flow sparsifiers that were recently introduced by Moitra, and Leighton and Moitra. We improve and generalize their results. We give a new polynomial-time algorithm for constructing O(log k / log log k) cut and flow sparsifiers, matching the best existential upper bound on the quality of a sparsifier, and improving the previous algorithmic upper bound of O(log^2 k / log log k). We show that flow sparsifiers can be obtained from linear operators approximating minimum metric extensions. We introduce the notion of (linear) metric extension operators, prove that they exist, and give an exact polynomial-time algorithm for finding optimal operators. We then establish a direct connection between flow and cut sparsifiers and Lipschitz extendability of maps in Banach spaces, a notion studied in functional analysis since 1930s. Using this connection, we prove a lower bound of Omega(sqrt{log k/log log k}) for flow sparsifiers and a lower bound of Omega(sqrt{log k}/log log k) for cut sparsifiers. We show that if a certain open question posed by Ball in 1992 has a positive answer, then there exist tilde O(sqrt{log k}) cut sparsifiers. On the other hand, any lower bound on cut sparsifiers better than tilde Omega(sqrt{log k}) would imply a negative answer to this question.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Let $G$ be a graph and $S, T subseteq V(G)$ be (possibly overlapping) sets of terminals, $|S|=|T|=k$. We are interested in computing a vertex sparsifier for terminal cuts in $G$, i.e., a graph $H$ on a smallest possible number of vertices, where $S c
up T subseteq V(H)$ and such that for every $A subseteq S$ and $B subseteq T$ the size of a minimum $(A,B)$-vertex cut is the same in $G$ as in $H$. We assume that our graphs are unweighted and that terminals may be part of the min-cut. In previous work, Kratsch and Wahlstrom (FOCS 2012/JACM 2020) used connections to matroid theory to show that a vertex sparsifier $H$ with $O(k^3)$ vertices can be computed in randomized polynomial time, even for arbitrary digraphs $G$. However, since then, no improvements on the size $O(k^3)$ have been shown. In this paper, we draw inspiration from the renowned Bollobass Two-Families Theorem in extremal combinatorics and introduce the use of total orderings into Kratsch and Wahlstroms methods. This new perspective allows us to construct a sparsifier $H$ of $Theta(k^2)$ vertices for the case that $G$ is a DAG. We also show how to compute $H$ in time near-linear in the size of $G$, improving on the previous $O(n^{omega+1})$. Furthermore, $H$ recovers the closest min-cut in $G$ for every partition $(A,B)$, which was not previously known. Finally, we show that a sparsifier of size $Omega(k^2)$ is required, both for DAGs and for undirected edge cuts.
We construct a regular random projection of a metric space onto a closed doubling subset and use it to linearly extend Lipschitz and $C^1$ functions. This way we prove more directly a result by Lee and Naor and we generalize the $C^1$ extension theorem by Whitney to Banach spaces.
We study distributed algorithms built around edge contraction based vertex sparsifiers, and give sublinear round algorithms in the $textsf{CONGEST}$ model for exact mincost flow, negative weight shortest paths, maxflow, and bipartite matching on spar
se graphs. For the maxflow problem, this is the first exact distributed algorithm that applies to directed graphs, while the previous work by [Ghaffari et al. SICOMP18] considered the approximate setting and works only for undirected graphs. For the mincost flow and the negative weight shortest path problems, our results constitute the first exact distributed algorithms running in a sublinear number of rounds. These algorithms follow the celebrated Laplacian paradigm, which numerically solve combinatorial graph problems via series of linear systems in graph Laplacian matrices. To enable Laplacian based algorithms in the distributed setting, we develop a Laplacian solver based upon the subspace sparsifiers of [Li, Schild FOCS18]. We give a parallel variant of their algorithm that avoids the sampling of random spanning trees, and analyze it using matrix martingales. Combining this vertex reduction recursively with both tree and elimination based preconditioners leads to an algorithm for solving Laplacian systems on $n$ vertex graphs to high accuracy in $O(n^{o(1)}(sqrt{n}+D))$ rounds. The round complexity of this distributed solver almost matches the lower bound of $widetilde{Omega}(sqrt{n}+D)$.
Cuts in graphs are a fundamental object of study, and play a central role in the study of graph algorithms. The problem of sparsifying a graph while approximately preserving its cut structure has been extensively studied and has many applications. In
a seminal work, Benczur and Karger (1996) showed that given any $n$-vertex undirected weighted graph $G$ and a parameter $varepsilon in (0,1)$, there is a near-linear time algorithm that outputs a weighted subgraph $G$ of $G$ of size $tilde{O}(n/varepsilon^2)$ such that the weight of every cut in $G$ is preserved to within a $(1 pm varepsilon)$-factor in $G$. The graph $G$ is referred to as a {em $(1 pm varepsilon)$-approximate cut sparsifier} of $G$. A natural question is if such cut-preserving sparsifiers also exist for hypergraphs. Kogan and Krauthgamer (2015) initiated a study of this question and showed that given any weighted hypergraph $H$ where the cardinality of each hyperedge is bounded by $r$, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to find a $(1 pm varepsilon)$-approximate cut sparsifier of $H$ of size $tilde{O}(frac{nr}{varepsilon^2})$. Since $r$ can be as large as $n$, in general, this gives a hypergraph cut sparsifier of size $tilde{O}(n^2/varepsilon^2)$, which is a factor $n$ larger than the Benczur-Karger bound for graphs. It has been an open question whether or not Benczur-Karger bound is achievable on hypergraphs. In this work, we resolve this question in the affirmative by giving a new polynomial-time algorithm for creating hypergraph sparsifiers of size $tilde{O}(n/varepsilon^2)$.
Graph sparsification has been studied extensively over the past two decades, culminating in spectral sparsifiers of optimal size (up to constant factors). Spectral hypergraph sparsification is a natural analogue of this problem, for which optimal bou
nds on the sparsifier size are not known, mainly because the hypergraph Laplacian is non-linear, and thus lacks the linear-algebraic structure and tools that have been so effective for graphs. Our main contribution is the first algorithm for constructing $epsilon$-spectral sparsifiers for hypergraphs with $O^*(n)$ hyperedges, where $O^*$ suppresses $(epsilon^{-1} log n)^{O(1)}$ factors. This bound is independent of the rank $r$ (maximum cardinality of a hyperedge), and is essentially best possible due to a recent bit complexity lower bound of $Omega(nr)$ for hypergraph sparsification. This result is obtained by introducing two new tools. First, we give a new proof of spectral concentration bounds for sparsifiers of graphs; it avoids linear-algebraic methods, replacing e.g.~the usual application of the matrix Bernstein inequality and therefore applies to the (non-linear) hypergraph setting. To achieve the result, we design a new sequence of hypergraph-dependent $epsilon$-nets on the unit sphere in $mathbb{R}^n$. Second, we extend the weight assignment technique of Chen, Khanna and Nagda [FOCS20] to the spectral sparsification setting. Surprisingly, the number of spanning trees after the weight assignment can serve as a potential function guiding the reweighting process in the spectral setting.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
