ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
This article is a thorough critique to the Plakhutin-Davidsons comments made to our paper published in the recent year. A detailed critical examination of the arguments that led to the suggested comments by Plakhutin and Davidson reveals some serious flaws. It is demonstrated that the principle of the indistinguishability of identical particles is not taking into account in Roothaans open shell theory. This principle leads to the fact that the orbital-dependent energy functional and, therefore, the Hartree-Fock and Hartree-Fock-Roothaan equations for open shell systems presented by Roothaan and others are not, in general, invariant under unitary transformation of the combined closed-open shells orbitals. From a mathematical point of view this statement is fundamentally flawless. It is shown that the Plakhutin-Davidsons personal views about our assumptions concerning the insufficiencies of classic Roothaans open-shell theory are undisputedly wrong.
Condensed Fermi systems with an odd number of particles can be described by means of polarizing external fields having a time-odd character. We illustrate how this works for Fermi gases and atomic nuclei treated by density functional theory or Hartre
On the way of a microscopic derivation of covariant density functionals, the first complete solution of the relativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (RBHF) equations is presented for symmetric nuclear matter. In most of the earlier investigations, the $G$
We present a computational approach to infinite nuclear matter employing Hartree-Fock theory, many-body perturbation theory and coupled cluster theory. These lectures are closely linked with those of chapters 9, 10 and 11 and serve as input for the c
We investigate the order-by-order convergence behavior of many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) as a simple and efficient tool to approximate the ground-state energy of closed-shell nuclei. To address the convergence properties directly, we explore pe
This comment criticizes the above paper by Xiao-Yin Pan and Viraht Sahni. It is shown that their formulation of Physical Current Density Functional Theory is, at best, a garbled reformulation of the Vignale-Rasolt current-density functional theory, a