ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We make some remarks on Sokhan and Quirkes [{it Phys. Rev. E} 78, 015301(R) (2008)] paper (arXiv:0805.1666). Sokhan and Quirke mentioned that, considering their main result, {the slip coefficient is independent of the external force (flux)} which is not consistent with previous measurements and approaches. We also discuss the sudden changes of the slip coefficient for larger Knudsen numbers or smaller nanopores.
We make remarks on Sofos {it et al.}s [{it Phys. Rev. E} 79, 026305 (2009)] paper. The focus is about the monotonicity of the slip length of which it is different from previous similar numerical simulation. We also offer a possible explanation for this.
We make remarks on Neufeld {it et al.}s [{it Phys. Rev. C} 78, 041901(R) (2008), arXiv:0802.2254] paper especially about the Mach cone formation. We argue that the original bow shock structure (as a fast parton moving through a quark-gluon plasma) ha
In a series of papers, Bartelt and co-workers developed novel snow-avalanche models in which emph{random kinetic energy} $R_K$ (a.k.a. granular temperature) is a key concept. The earliest models were for a single, constant density layer, using a Voel
We derive general conditions of slip of a fluid on the boundary. Under these conditions the velocity of the fluid on the immovable boundary is a function of the normal and tangential components of the force acting on the surface of the fluid. A probl
This article focuses on correcting several factual errors and critiques in the previously published Letter in Phys. Rev. L, Vol. 89, No. 10, 2022, by D. Shapira and M. Saltmarsh. The authors of the Letter did not perform their own independent experim