اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدA Review of Dispersion Control Charts for Multivariate Individual Observations
58
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
A multivariate control chart is designed to monitor process parameters of multiple correlated quality characteristics. Often data on multivariate processes are collected as individual observations, i.e. as vectors one at the time. Various control charts have been proposed in the literature to monitor the covariance matrix of a process when individual observations are collected. In this study, we review this literature; we find 30 relevant articles from the period 1987-2019. We group the articles into five categories. We observe that less research has been done on CUSUM, high-dimensional and non-parametric type control charts for monitoring the process covariance matrix. We describe each proposed method, state their advantages, and limitations. Finally, we give suggestions for future research.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Monitoring several correlated quality characteristics of a process is common in modern manufacturing and service industries. Although a lot of attention has been paid to monitoring the multivariate process mean, not many control charts are available
for monitoring the covariance matrix. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the literature on control charts for monitoring the covariance matrix in a multivariate statistical process monitoring (MSPM) framework. It classifies the research that has previously appeared in the literature. We highlight the challenging areas for research and provide some directions for future research.
We argue against the use of generally weighted moving average (GWMA) control charts. Our primary reasons are the following: 1) There is no recursive formula for the GWMA control chart statistic, so all previous data must be stored and used in the cal
culation of each chart statistic. 2) The Markovian property does not apply to the GWMA statistics, so computer simulation must be used to determine control limits and the statistical performance. 3) An appropriately designed, and much simpler, exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart provides as good or better statistical performance. 4) In some cases the GWMA chart gives more weight to past data values than to current values.
In high reliability standards fields such as automotive, avionics or aerospace, the detection of anomalies is crucial. An efficient methodology for automatically detecting multivariate outliers is introduced. It takes advantage of the remarkable prop
erties of the Invariant Coordinate Selection (ICS) method. Based on the simultaneous spectral decomposition of two scatter matrices, ICS leads to an affine invariant coordinate system in which the Euclidian distance corresponds to a Mahalanobis Distance (MD) in the original coordinates. The limitations of MD are highlighted using theoretical arguments in a context where the dimension of the data is large. Unlike MD, ICS makes it possible to select relevant components which removes the limitations. Owing to the resulting dimension reduction, the method is expected to improve the power of outlier detection rules such as MD-based criteria. It also greatly simplifies outliers interpretation. The paper includes practical guidelines for using ICS in the context of a small proportion of outliers which is relevant in high reliability standards fields. The choice of scatter matrices together with the selection of relevant invariant components through parallel analysis and normality tests are addressed. The use of the regular covariance matrix and the so called matrix of fourth moments as the scatter pair is recommended. This choice combines the simplicity of implementation together with the possibility to derive theoretical results. A simulation study confirms the good properties of the proposal and compares it with other scatter pairs. This study also provides a comparison with Principal Component Analysis and MD. The performance of our proposal is also evaluated on several real data sets using a user-friendly R package accompanying the paper.
A multivariate dispersion control chart monitors changes in the process variability of multiple correlated quality characteristics. In this article, we investigate and compare the performance of charts designed to monitor variability based on individ
ual and grouped multivariate observations. We compare one of the most well-known methods for monitoring individual observations -- a multivariate EWMA chart proposed by Huwang et al -- to various charts based on grouped observations. In addition, we compare charts based on monitoring with overlapping and nonoverlapping subgroups. We recommend using charts based on overlapping subgroups when monitoring with subgroup data. The effect of subgroup size is also investigated. Steady-state average time to signal is used as performance measure. We show that monitoring methods based on individual observations are the quickest in detecting sustained shifts in the process variability. We use a simulation study to obtain our results and illustrated these with a case study.
Given the cost and duration of phase III and phase IV clinical trials, the development of statistical methods for go/no-go decisions is vital. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian methodology to compute the probability of success based on the curre
nt data of a treatment regimen for the multivariate linear model. Our approach utilizes a Bayesian seemingly unrelated regression model, which allows for multiple endpoints to be modeled jointly even if the covariates between the endpoints are different. Correlations between endpoints are explicitly modeled. This Bayesian joint modeling approach unifies single and multiple testing procedures under a single framework. We develop an approach to multiple testing that asymptotically guarantees strict family-wise error rate control, and is more powerful than frequentist approaches to multiplicity. The method effectively yields those of Ibrahim et al. and Chuang-Stein as special cases, and, to our knowledge, is the only method that allows for robust sample size determination for multiple endpoints and/or hypotheses and the only method that provides strict family-wise type I error control in the presence of multiplicity.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
