In this paper we compute the Casimir energy for a coupled fermion-pseudoscalar field system. In the model considered in this paper the pseudoscalar field is textit{static} and textit{prescribed} with two adjustable parameters. These parameters determ
ine the values of the field at infinity ($pm theta_0$) and its scale of variation ($mu$). One can build up a field configuration with arbitrary topological charge by changing $theta_0$, and interpolate between the extreme adiabatic and non-adiabatic regimes by changing $mu$. This system is exactly solvable and therefore we compute the Casimir energy exactly and unambiguously by using an energy density subtraction scheme. We show that in general the Casimir energy goes to zero in the extreme adiabatic limit, and in the extreme non-adiabatic limit when the asymptotic values of the pseudoscalar field properly correspond to a configuration with an arbitrary topological charge. Moreover, in general the Casimir energy is always positive and on the average an increasing function of $theta_0$ and always has local maxima when there is a zero mode, showing that these configurations are energetically unfavorable. We also compute and display the energy densities associated with the spectral deficiencies in both of the continua, and those of the bound states. We show that the energy densities associated with the distortion of the spectrum of the states with $E>0$ and $E<0$ are mirror images of each other. We also compute and display the Casimir energy density. Finally we compute the energy of a system consisting of a soliton and a valance electron and show that the Casimir energy of the system is comparable with the binding energy.
We compute the Casimir energy for a system consisting of a fermion and a pseudoscalar field in the form of a prescribed kink. This model is not exactly solvable and we use the phase shift method to compute the Casimir energy. We use the relaxation me
thod to find the bound states and the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method to obtain the scattering wavefunctions of the fermion in the whole interval of $x$. The resulting phase shifts are consistent with the weak and strong forms of the Levinson theorem. Then, we compute and plot the Casimir energy as a function of the parameters of the pseudoscalar field, i.e. the slope of $phi(x)$ at x=0 ($mu$) and the value of $phi(x)$ at infinity ($theta_0$). In the graph of the Casimir energy as a function of $mu$ there is a sharp maximum occurring when the fermion bound state energy crosses the line of E=0. Furthermore, this graph shows that the Casimir energy goes to zero for $murightarrow 0$, and also for $murightarrow infty$ when $theta_0$ is an integer multiple of $pi$. Moreover, the graph of the Casimir energy as a function of $theta_0$ shows that this energy is on the average an increasing function of $theta_0$ and has a cusp whenever there is a zero fermionic mode. We finally compute the total energy of a system consisting of a valence fermion in the ground state. Most importantly, we show that this energy (the sum of the Casimir energy and the energy of the fermion) is minimum when the background field has winding number one, independent of the details of the background profile. Throughout the paper we compare our results with those of a simple exactly solvable model, where a piece-wise linear profile approximates the kink. We find that the kink is an almost reflectionless barrier for the fermions, within the context of our model.
In this paper we introduce an alternative renormalization program for systems with non-perturbative conditions. The non-perturbative conditions that we concentrate on in this paper are confined to be either the presence of non-trivial boundary condit
ions or non-perturbative background fields. We show that these non-perturbative conditions have profound effects on all physical properties of the system and our renormalization program is consistent with these conditions. We formulate the general renormalization program in the configuration space. The differences between the free space renormalization program and ours manifest themselves in the counter-terms as well, which we shall elucidate. The general expressions that we obtain for the counter-terms reduce to the standard results in the free space cases. We show that the differences between these divergent counter-terms are extremely small. Moreover we argue that the position dependences induced on the parameters of the renormalized Lagrangian via the loop corrections, however small, are direct and natural consequences of the non-perturbative position dependent conditions imposed on the system.
