Determining the optimal arrangement of superconducting layers to withstand large amplitude AC magnetic fields is important for certain applications such as superconducting radiofrequency cavities. In this paper, we evaluate the shielding potential of
the superconducting film/insulating film/superconductor (SIS) structure, a configuration that could provide benefits in screening large AC magnetic fields. After establishing that for high frequency magnetic fields, flux penetration must be avoided, the superheating field of the structure is calculated in the London limit both numerically and, for thin films, analytically. For intermediate film thicknesses and realistic material parameters we also solve numerically the Ginzburg-Landau equations. It is shown that a small enhancement of the superheating field is possible, on the order of a few percent, for the SIS structure relative to a bulk superconductor of the film material, if the materials and thicknesses are chosen appropriately.
A comment to the authors SRF Conference pre-print [1] was submitted by A. Gurevich to the arXiv [2]. In this response, we show that the arguments used in the comment are not valid. [1] arXiv:1309.3239 [2] arXiv:1309.5626
The SIS structure---a thin superconducting film on a bulk superconductor separated by a thin insulating film---was propsed as a method to protect alternative SRF materials from flux penetration by enhancing the first critical field $B_{c1}$. In this
work, we show that in fact $B_{c1}$ = 0 for a SIS structure. We calculate the superheating field $B_{sh}$, and we show that it can be enhanced slightly using the SIS structure, but only for a small range of film thicknesses and only if the film and the bulk are different materials. We also show that using a multilayer instead of a single thick layer is detrimental, as this decreases $B_{sh}$ of the film. We calculate the dissipation due to vortex penetration above the $B_{sh}$ of the film, and find that it is unmanageable for SRF applications. However, we find that if a gradient in the phase of the order parameter is introduced, SIS structures may be able to shield large DC and low frequency fields. We argue that the SIS structure is not beneficial for SRF cavities, but due to recent experiments showing low-surface-resistance performance above $B_{c1}$ in cavities made of superconductors with small coherence lengths, we argue that enhancement of $B_{c1}$ is not necessary, and that bulk films of alternative materials show great promise.
