NuSTAR observed the bright Compton-thin, narrow line Seyfert 1 galaxy, NGC 5506, for about 56 ks. In agreement with past observations, the spectrum is well fit by a power law with Gamma~1.9, a distant reflection component and narrow ionized iron line
s. A relativistically blurred reflection component is not required by the data. When an exponential high energy cutoff is added to the power law, a value of 720(+130,-190) keV (90% confidence level) is found. Even allowing for systematic uncertainties, we find a 3 sigma lower limit to the high-energy cutoff of 350 keV, the highest lower limit to the cutoff energy found so far in an AGN by NuSTAR.
We present simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations of the `bare Seyfert 1 galaxy, Ark 120, a system in which ionized absorption is absent. The NuSTAR hard X-ray spectral coverage allows us to constrain different models for the excess soft X-r
ay emission. Among phenomenological models, a cutoff power law best explains the soft X-ray emission. This model likely corresponds to Comptonization of the accretion disk seed UV photons by a population of warm electrons: using Comptonization models, a temperature of ~0.3 keV and an optical depth of ~13 are found. If the UV-to-X-ray optxagnf model is applied, the UV fluxes from the XMM-$Newton$ Optical Monitor suggest an intermediate black hole spin. Contrary to several other sources observed by NuSTAR, no high energy cutoff is detected, with a lower limit of 190 keV.
In about half of Seyfert galaxies, the X-ray emission is absorbed by an optically thin, ionized medium, the so-called Warm Absorber, whose origin and location is still a matter of debate. The aims of this paper is to put more constraints on the warm
absorber by studying its variability. We analyzed the X-ray spectra of a Seyfert 1 galaxy, Mrk 704, which was observed twice, three years apart, by XMM-Newton. The spectra were well fitted with a two zones absorber, possibly covering only partially the source. The parameters of the absorbing matter - column density, ionization state, covering factor - changed significantly between the two observations. Possible explanations for the more ionized absorber are a torus wind (the source is a polar scattering one) or, in the partial covering scenario, an accretion disk wind. The less ionized absorber may be composed of orbiting clouds in the surroundings of the nucleus, similarly to what already found in other sources, most notably NGC 1365.
