Transport measurements on the two dimensional electron system in Al2O3 SrTiO3 heterostructures indicate significant noncrystalline anisotropic behavior below T = 30 K. Lattice dislocations in SrTiO3 and interfacial steps are suggested to be the main
sources for electronic anisotropy. Anisotropic defect scattering likewise alters magnetoresistance at low temperature remarkably and influences spin-orbit coupling significantly by the Elliot Yafet mechanism of spin relaxation resulting in anisotropic weak localization. Applying a magnetic field parallel to the interface results in an additional field induced anisotropy of the conductance, which can be attributed to Rashba spin orbit interaction. Compared to LaAlO3 SrTiO3, Rashba coupling seems to be reduced indicating a weaker polarity in Al2O3 SrTiO3 heterostructures.
Two-dimensional electron systems found at the interface of SrTiO3-based oxide heterostructures often display anisotropic electric transport whose origin is currently under debate. To characterize transport along specific crystallographic directions,
we developed a hard-mask patterning routine based on an amorphous CeO2 template layer. The technique allows preparing well-defined microbridges by conventional ultraviolet photolithography which, in comparison to standard techniques such as ion- or wet-chemical etching, does not induce any degradation of interfacial conductance. The patterning scheme is described in details and the successful production of microbridges based on amorphous Al2O3-SrTiO3 heterostructures is demonstrated. Significant anisotropic transport is observed for T < 30 K which is mainly related to impurity/defect scattering of charge carriers in these heterostructures.
The low-temperature thermal expansion of CeCoIn5 single crystals measured parallel and perpendicular to magnetic fields B oriented along the c axis yields the volume thermal-expansion coefficient $beta$. Considerable deviations of $beta(T)$ from Ferm
i-liquid behavior occur already within the superconducting region of the (B, T) phase diagram and become maximal at the upper critical field $B^0_{c2}$. However, $beta(T)$ and the Gruneisen parameter $Gamma$ are incompatible with a quantum critical point (QCP) at $B^0_{c2}$, but allow for a QCP shielded by superconductivity and extending to negative pressures for $B < B^0_{c2}$. Together with literature data we construct a tentative (p, B, T) phase diagram of CeCoIn5 suggesting a quantum critical line in the (p, B) plane.
