Simulation leagues: Enabling replicable and robust investigation of complex robotic systems

Physically-realistic simulated environments are powerful platforms for enabling measurable, replicable and statistically-robust investigation of complex robotic systems. Such environments are epitomised by the RoboCup simulation leagues, which have been successfully utilised to conduct massively-parallel experiments in topics including: optimisation of bipedal locomotion, self-localisation from noisy perception data and planning complex multi-agent strategies without direct agent-to-agent communication. Many of these systems are later transferred to physical robots, making the simulation leagues invaluable well-beyond the scope of simulated soccer matches. In this study, we provide an overview of the RoboCup simulation leagues and describe their properties as they pertain to replicable and robust robotics research. To demonstrate their utility directly, we leverage the ability to run parallelised experiments to evaluate different competition formats (e.g. round robin) for the RoboCup 2D simulation league. Our results demonstrate that a previously-proposed hybrid format minimises fluctuations from true (statistically-significant) team performance rankings within the time constraints of the RoboCup world finals. Our experimental analysis would be impossible with physical robots alone, and we encourage other researchers to explore the potential for enriching their experimental pipelines with simulated components, both to minimise experimental costsand enable others to replicate and expand upon their results in a hardware-independent manner.

Simulation leagues: Analysis of competition formats

The selection of an appropriate competition format is critical for both the success and credibility of any competition, both real and simulated. In this paper, the automated parallelism offered by the RoboCupSoccer 2D simulation league is leveraged to conduct a 28,000 game round-robin between the top 8 teams from RoboCup 2012 and 2013. A proposed new competition format is found to reduce variation from the resultant statistically significant team performance rankings by 75% and 67%, when compared to the actual competition results from RoboCup 2012 and 2013 respectively. These results are statistically validated by generating 10,000 random tournaments for each of the three considered formats and comparing the respective distributions of ranking discrepancy.