A subjective expected utility policy making centre, managing complex, dynamic systems, needs to draw on the expertise of a variety of disparate panels of experts and integrate this information coherently. To achieve this, diverse supporting probabili
stic models need to be networked together, the output of one model providing the input to the next. In this paper we provide a technology for designing an integrating decision support system and to enable the centre to explore and compare the efficiency of different candidate policies. We develop a formal statistical methodology to underpin this tool. In particular, we derive sufficient conditions that ensure inference remains coherent before and after relevant evidence is accommodated into the system. The methodology is illustrated throughout using examples drawn from two decision support systems: one designed for nuclear emergency crisis management and the other to support policy makers in addressing the complex challenges of food poverty in the UK.
