We construct a reference database of materials properties calculated using density-functional theory in the local or generalized-gradient approximation, and an all-electron or a projector augmented-wave (PAW) formulation, for verification and validat
ion of first-principles simulations. All-electron calculations use the full-potential linearised augmented-plane wave method, as implemented in the texttt{Elk} open-source code, while PAW calculations use the datasets developed by some of us in the open-source texttt{PSlibrary} repository and the texttt{Quantum ESPRESSO} distribution. We first calculate lattice parameters, bulk moduli, and energy differences for alkaline metals, alkaline earths, and $3d$ and $4d$ transition metals in three ideal, reference phases (simple cubic, fcc, and bcc), representing a standardized crystalline monoatomic solid-state test. Then, as suggested by K. Lejaeghere {it et al.}, [Critical Reviews in Solid State and Material Sciences 39, p 1 (2014)], we compare the equations of state for all elements, except lanthanides and actinides, in their experimental phase (or occasionally a simpler, closely related one). PAW and all-electron energy differences and structural parameters agree in most cases within a few meV/atom and a fraction of a percent, respectively. This level of agreement, comparable with the previous study, includes also other PAW and all-electron data from the electronic-structure codes texttt{VASP} and texttt{WIEN2K}, and underscores the overall reliability of current, state-of-the-art electronic-structure calculations. At the same time, discrepancies that arise even within the same formulation for simple, fundamental structural properties point to the urgent need of establishing standards for verification and validation, reference data sets, and careful refinements of the computational approaches used.
We investigate the pressure phase diagram of FeTe, predicting structural and magnetic properties in the normal state at zero temperature within density functional theory (DFT). We carefully examined several possible different crystal structures over
a pressure range up to $approx 30 $ GPa: simple tetragonal (PbO type), simple monoclinic, orthorhombic (MnP type), hexagonal (NiAs and wurzite type) and cubic (CsCl and NaCl type). We predict pressure to drive the system through different magnetic ordering (notably also some ferromagnetic phases) eventually suppressing magnetism at around 17GPa. We speculate the ferromagnetic order to be the reason for the absence of a superconducting phase in FeTe at variance with the case of FeSe.
The mechanism of superconductivity and magnetism and their possible interplay have recently been under debate in pnictides. A likely pairing mechanism includes an important role of spin fluctuations and can be expressed in terms of the magnetic susce
ptibility chi. The latter is therefore a key quantity in the determination of both the magnetic properties of the system in the normal state, and of the contribution of spin fluctuations to the pairing potential. A basic ingredient to obtain chi is the independent-electron susceptibility chi0. Using LaO1-xFxFeAs as a prototype material, in this report we present a detailed ab-initio study of chi0(q,omega), as a function of doping and of the internal atomic positions. The resulting static chi0(q,0) is consistent with both the observed M-point related magnetic stripe phase in the parent compound, and with the existence of incommensurate magnetic structures predicted by ab-initio calculations upon doping.
