The use of time-delay gravitational lenses to examine the cosmological expansion introduces a new standard ruler with which to test theoretical models. The sample suitable for this kind of work now includes 12 lens systems, which have thus far been u
sed solely for optimizing the parameters of $Lambda$CDM. In this paper, we broaden the base of support for this new, important cosmic probe by using these observations to carry out a one-on-one comparison between {it competing} models. The currently available sample indicates a likelihood of $sim 70-80%$ that the $R_{rm h}=ct$ Universe is the correct cosmology versus $sim 20-30%$ for the standard model. This possibly interesting result reinforces the need to greatly expand the sample of time-delay lenses, e.g., with the successful implementation of the Dark Energy Survey, the VST ATLAS survey, and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. In anticipation of a greatly expanded catalog of time-delay lenses identified with these surveys, we have produced synthetic samples to estimate how large they would have to be in order to rule out either model at a $sim 99.7%$ confidence level. We find that if the real cosmology is $Lambda$CDM, a sample of $sim 150$ time-delay lenses would be sufficient to rule out $R_{rm h}=ct$ at this level of accuracy, while $sim 1,000$ time-delay lenses would be required to rule out $Lambda$CDM if the real Universe is instead $R_{rm h}=ct$. This difference in required sample size reflects the greater number of free parameters available to fit the data with $Lambda$CDM.
