Software traceability plays a critical role in software maintenance and evolution. We conducted a systematic mapping study with six research questions to understand the benefits, costs, and challenges of using traceability in maintenance and evolutio
n. We systematically selected, analyzed, and synthesized 63 studies published between January 2000 and May 2020, and the results show that: traceability supports 11 maintenance and evolution activities, among which change management is the most frequently supported activity; strong empirical evidence from industry is needed to validate the impact of traceability on maintenance and evolution; easing the process of change management is the main benefit of deploying traceability practices; establishing and maintaining traceability links is the main cost of deploying traceability practices; 13 approaches and 32 tools that support traceability in maintenance and evolution were identified; improving the quality of traceability links, the performance of using traceability approaches and tools are the main traceability challenges in maintenance and evolution. The findings of this study provide a comprehensive understanding of deploying traceability practices in software maintenance and evolution phase, and can be used by researchers for future directions and practitioners for making informed decisions while using traceability in maintenance and evolution.
Context: Software Architecture (SA) and Source Code (SC) are two intertwined artefacts that represent the interdependent design decisions made at different levels of abstractions - High-Level (HL) and Low-Level (LL). An understanding of the relations
hips between SA and SC is expected to bridge the gap between SA and SC for supporting maintenance and evolution of software systems. Objective: We aimed at exploring practitioners understanding about the relationships between SA and SC. Method: We used a mixed-method that combines an online survey with 87 respondents and an interview with 8 participants to collect the views of practitioners from 37 countries about the relationships between SA and SC. Results: Our results reveal that: practitioners mainly discuss five features of relationships between SA and SC; a few practitioners have adopted dedicated approaches and tools in the literature for identifying and analyzing the relationships between SA and SC despite recognizing the importance of such information for improving a systems quality attributes, especially maintainability and reliability. It is felt that cost and effort are the major impediments that prevent practitioners from identifying, analyzing, and using the relationships between SA and SC. Conclusions: The results have empirically identified five features of relationships between SA and SC reported in the literature from the perspective of practitioners and a systematic framework to manage the five features of relationships should be developed with dedicated approaches and tools considering the cost and benefit of maintaining the relationships.
