Nowadays, the analysis of the X-ray spectra of magnetically powered neutron stars or magnetars is one of the most valuable tools to gain insight into the physical processes occurring in their interiors and magnetospheres. In particular, the magnetosp
heric plasma leaves a strong imprint on the observed X-ray spectrum by means of Compton up-scattering of the thermal radiation coming from the star surface. Motivated by the increased quality of the observational data, much theoretical work has been devoted to develop Monte Carlo (MC) codes that incorporate the effects of resonant Compton scattering in the modeling of radiative transfer of photons through the magnetosphere. The two key ingredients in this simulations are the kinetic plasma properties and the magnetic field (MF) configuration. The MF geometry is expected to be complex, but up to now only mathematically simple solutions (self-similar solutions) have been employed. In this work, we discuss the effects of new, more realistic, MF geometries on synthetic spectra. We use new force-free solutions in a previously developed MC code to assess the influence of MF geometry on the emerging spectra. Our main result is that the shape of the final spectrum is mostly sensitive to uncertain parameters of the magnetospheric plasma, but the MF geometry plays an important role on the angle-dependence of the spectra.
The Anti Coincidence Shield (ACS) of the INTEGRAL SPI instrument provides an excellent sensitivity for the detection of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) above ~ 75keV, but no directional and energy information is available. We studied the ACS response by usin
g GRBs with known localizations and good spectral information derived by other satellites. We derived a count rate to flux conversion factor for different energy ranges and studied its dependence on the GRB direction and spectral hardness. For a typical GRB spectrum, we found that 1 ACS count corresponds on average to ~ 1E-10 erg/cm^2 in the 75keV-1MeV range, for directions orthogonal to the satellite pointing axis. This is broadly consistent with the ACS effective area derived from the Monte Carlo simulations, but there is some indication that the latter slightly overestimates the ACS sensitivity, especially for directions close to the instrument axis.
