Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Fall of AGN and the Rise of Star-Forming Galaxies: A Close Look at the Chandra Deep Field X-ray Number Counts
272
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
F. E. Bauer
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We investigate the X-ray number counts in the 1-2 Ms Chandra Deep Fields (CDFs) to determine the contributions of faint X-ray source populations to the extragalactic X-ray background (XRB). X-ray sources were separated into Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN), star-forming galaxies, and Galactic stars based on several criteria. We find that AGN continue to dominate the number counts in the 0.5-2.0 keV and 2-8 keV bands. At flux limits of ~2.5e-17 erg cm-2 s-1 (0.5-2.0 keV) and ~1.4e-16 erg cm-2 s-1 (2-8 keV), the overall AGN source densities are 7166 (+304/-292) and 4558 (+216/-207) sources deg-2, respectively; these are factors of ~10-20 higher than found in the deepest optical spectroscopic surveys. While still a minority, the number counts of star-forming galaxies climb steeply such that they eventually achieve source densities of 1727 (+187/-169) and 711 (+270/-202) sources deg-2 at the CDF 0.5-2.0 keV and 2-8 keV flux limits, respectively. Adopting recent XRB flux densities measurements, the CDFs resolve a total of 89.5% (+5.9%/-5.7%) and 86.9% (+6.6%/-6.3%) of the extragalactic 0.5-2.0 keV and 2-8 keV XRBs, respectively. Extrapolation of the number-count slopes can easily account for the entire 0.5-2.0 keV and 2-8 keV XRBs to within statistical errors. We also revisit the reported differences between the CDF-North and CDF-South number counts, finding that the two fields are consistent except for sources in the 2-8 keV band below F(2-8 keV)~1e-15 erg cm-2 s-1, where deviations gradually increase to ~3.9 sigma.
rate research
Read More
The behaviour of the X-ray number counts of normal galaxies at faint (-18<Log F<-15 cgs in the 0.5-2.0 keV band) fluxes is investigated. The joint use of information from radio, far infrared and X-ray surveys allows the determination of the LogN-LogS of galaxies within a factor-of-3 over the whole flux range considered.
We have combined multi-wavelength observations of a selected sample of starforming galaxies with galaxy evolution models in order to compare the results obtained for different SFR tracers and to study the effect that the evolution of the starforming regions has on them. We also aimed at obtaining a better understanding of the corrections due to extinction and nuclear activity on the derivation of the SFR. We selected the sample from Chandra data for the well studied region Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS) and chose the objects that also have UV and IR data from GALEX and GOODS-Spitzer respectively. Our main finding is that there is good agreement between the extinction corrected SFR(UV) and the SFR(X), and we confirm the use of X-ray luminosities as a trustful tracer of recent star formation activity. Nevertheless, at SFR(UV) larger than about 5Msol/year there are several galaxies with an excess of SFR(X) suggesting the presence of an obscured AGN not detected in the optical spectra. We conclude that the IR luminosity is driven by recent star formation even in those galaxies where the SFR(X) is an order of magnitude higher than the SFR(UV) and therefore may harbour an AGN. One object shows SFR(X) much lower than expected based on the SFR(UV); this SFR(X) `deficit may be due to an early transient phase before most of the massive X-ray binaries were formed. An X-ray deficit could be used to select extremely young bursts in an early phase just after the explosion of the first supernovae associated with massive stars and before the onset of massive X-ray binaries.
We investigate the spatial clustering of X-ray selected sources in the two deepest X-ray fields to date, namely the 2Msec Chandra Deep Field North (CDFN) and the 1Msec Chandra Deep Field South (CDFS). The projected correlation function w(r_p), measured on scales ~0.2-10 h^-1 Mpc for a sample of 240 sources with spectroscopic redshift in the CDFN and 124 sources in the CDFS at a median redshift of z~0.8, is used to constrain the amplitude and slope of the real space correlation function xi(r)=(r/r0)^-gamma. The clustering signal is detected at high confidence (>~ 7 sigma) in both fields. The amplitude of the correlation is found to be significantly different in the two fields, the correlation length r0 being 8.6 +- 1.2 h^-1 Mpc in the CDFS and 4.2 +- 0.4 h^-1 Mpc in the CDFN, while the correlation slope gamma is found to be flat in both fields: gamma=1.33 +- 0.11 in the CDFS and gamma=1.42 +- 0.07 in the CDFN (a flat Universe with Omega_m=0.3 and Omega_L=0.7 is assumed; 1 sigma Poisson error estimates are considered). The correlation function has been also measured separately for sources classified as AGN or galaxies. In both fields AGN have a median redshift of z~0.9 and a median 0.5-10 keV luminosity of L_x~10^43 erg s^-1, i.e. they are generally in the Seyfert luminosity regime. As in the case of the total samples, we found a significant difference in the AGN clustering amplitude between the two fields, the best fit correlation parameters being r0=10.3 +- 1.7 h^-1 Mpc, gamma=1.33 +- 0.14 in the CDFS, and r0=5.5 +- 0.6 h^-1 Mpc, gamma=1.50 +- 0.12 in the CDFN. Within each field no statistically significant difference is found between soft and hard X-ray selected sources or between type 1 and type 2 AGN. (abridged)
Deep Swift UV/Optical Telescope (UVOT) imaging of the Chandra Deep Field South is used to measure galaxy number counts in three near ultraviolet (NUV) filters (uvw2: 1928 A, uvm2: 2246 A, uvw1: 2600 A) and the u band (3645 A). UVOT observations cover the break in the slope of the NUV number counts with greater precision than the number counts by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) and the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX), spanning a range from 21 < m_AB < 25. Number counts models confirm earlier investigations in favoring models with an evolving galaxy luminosity function.
(abridged) A detailed comparison is performed of the LFs compiled at infrared, radio and optical wavelengths and converted into XLFs using available relations with the XLF directly estimated in the 0.5--2 keV energy band from X-ray surveys (Norman et al). We find that the XLF from the local sample of IRAS galaxies (Takeuchi et al) provides a good representation of all available data samples; pure luminosity evolution of the form (1+z)^eta, with eta< ~3, is favoured over pure density. The local X-ray luminosity density is also well defined. We discuss different estimates of the galaxies LogN-LogS, selected from the Chandra Deep Fields with different selection criteria: these have similar slopes, but normalisations scattered within a factor ~2, of the same order of the Poissonian error on the counts. We compare the observed LogN-LogS with the counts predicted by integrating our reference z=0 XLF. By using number counts alone, it is not possible to discriminate between density and luminosity evolution; however, the evolution of galaxies must be stopped in both cases at z~1-2. The contribution of galaxies to the X-ray background is found to be in the range 6%--12%. Making use of cosmic star formation models, we find that the X-ray LogN-LogS might be not compatible with very large star formation rates at z ~ 3 as suggested by sub-mm observations in Blain et al. 1999. As to the content of current and, possibly, future X-ray surveys, we determine the fraction of galaxies around the current flux limit: (30+-12 %). At fainter fluxes the fraction of galaxies will probably rise, and overcome the counts from AGN at fluxes < ~10^{-17} erg/s/cm^2.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
