Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userRelativistic Cosmology Number Counts and the Luminosity Function
68
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This paper aims to connect the theory of relativistic cosmology number counts with the astronomical data, practice, and theory behind the galaxy luminosity function (LF). We treat galaxies as the building blocks of the Universe, but ignore most aspects of their internal structures by considering them as point sources. However, we do consider general morphological types in order to use data from galaxy redshift surveys, where some kind of morphological classification is adopted. We start with a general relativistic treatment for a general spacetime, and then link the derived expressions with the LF definition adopted in observational cosmology. Then equations for differential number counts, the related relativistic density per source, and observed and total relativistic energy densities of the universe, and other related quantities are written in terms of the luminosity and selection functions. As an example of how these theoretical/observational relationships can be used, we apply them to test the LF parameters determined from the CNOC2 galaxy redshift survey, for consistency with the Einstein-de Sitter (EdS) cosmology, which they assume, for intermediate redshifts. We conclude that there is a general consistency for the tests we carried out, namely both the observed relativistic mass-energy density, and the observed relativistic mass-energy density per source, which is equivalent to differential number counts, in an EdS Universe. In addition, we find clear evidence of a large amount of hidden mass, as has been obvious from many earlier investigations. At the same time, we find that the CNOC2 LF give differential galaxy counts somewhat above the EdS predictions, indicating that this survey observes more galaxies at 0.1 < z < 0.4 than the models predictions.
rate research
Read More
This paper studies the connection between the relativistic number density of galaxies down the past light cone in a Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker spacetime with non-vanishing cosmological constant and the galaxy luminosity function (LF) data. It extends the redshift range of previous results presented in Albani et al. (2007:astro-ph/0611032) where the galaxy distribution was studied out to z=1. Observational inhomogeneities were detected at this range. This research also searches for LF evolution in the context of the framework advanced by Ribeiro and Stoeger (2003:astro-ph/0304094), further developing the theory linking relativistic cosmology theory and LF data. Selection functions are obtained using the Schechter parameters and redshift parametrization of the galaxy luminosity functions obtained from an I-band selected dataset of the FORS Deep Field galaxy survey in the redshift range 0.5<z<5.0 for its blue bands and 0.75<z<3.0 for its red ones. Differential number counts, densities and other related observables are obtained, and then used with the calculated selection functions to study the empirical radial distribution of the galaxies in a fully relativistic framework. The redshift range of the dataset used in this work, which is up to five times larger than the one used in previous studies, shows an increased relevance of the relativistic effects of expansion when compared to the evolution of the LF at the higher redshifts. The results also agree with the preliminary ones presented in Albani et al. (2007:astro-ph/0611032), suggesting a power-law behavior of relativistic densities at high redshifts when they are defined in terms of the luminosity distance.
(abridged) A detailed comparison is performed of the LFs compiled at infrared, radio and optical wavelengths and converted into XLFs using available relations with the XLF directly estimated in the 0.5--2 keV energy band from X-ray surveys (Norman et al). We find that the XLF from the local sample of IRAS galaxies (Takeuchi et al) provides a good representation of all available data samples; pure luminosity evolution of the form (1+z)^eta, with eta< ~3, is favoured over pure density. The local X-ray luminosity density is also well defined. We discuss different estimates of the galaxies LogN-LogS, selected from the Chandra Deep Fields with different selection criteria: these have similar slopes, but normalisations scattered within a factor ~2, of the same order of the Poissonian error on the counts. We compare the observed LogN-LogS with the counts predicted by integrating our reference z=0 XLF. By using number counts alone, it is not possible to discriminate between density and luminosity evolution; however, the evolution of galaxies must be stopped in both cases at z~1-2. The contribution of galaxies to the X-ray background is found to be in the range 6%--12%. Making use of cosmic star formation models, we find that the X-ray LogN-LogS might be not compatible with very large star formation rates at z ~ 3 as suggested by sub-mm observations in Blain et al. 1999. As to the content of current and, possibly, future X-ray surveys, we determine the fraction of galaxies around the current flux limit: (30+-12 %). At fainter fluxes the fraction of galaxies will probably rise, and overcome the counts from AGN at fluxes < ~10^{-17} erg/s/cm^2.
We present a fully nonlinear and relativistically covariant expression for the observed galaxy density contrast. Building on a null tetrad tailored to the cosmological observers past light cone, we find a decomposition of the nonlinear galaxy over-density into manifestly gauge-invariant quantities, each of which has a clear physical interpretation as a cosmological observable. This ensures that the monopole of the galaxy over-density field is properly accounted for. We anticipate that this decomposition will be useful for future work on nonlinearities in galaxy number counts, for example, deriving the relativistic expression for the galaxy bispectrum. We then specialise our results to conformal Newtonian gauge, with a Hubble parameter either defined globally or measured locally, illustrating the significance of the different contributions to the observed monopole of the galaxy density.
Our velocity relative to the cosmic microwave background (CMB) generates a dipole from the CMB monopole, which was accurately measured by COBE. The relative velocity also modulates and aberrates the CMB fluctuations, generating a small signature of statistical isotropy violation in the covariance matrix. This signature was first measured by Planck 2013. Galaxy surveys are similarly affected by a Doppler boost. The dipole generated from the number count monopole has been extensively discussed, and measured (at very low accuracy) in the NVSS and TGSS radio continuum surveys. For the first time, we present an analysis of the Doppler imprint on the number count fluctuations, using the bipolar spherical harmonic formalism to quantify these effects. Next-generation wide-area surveys with a high redshift range are needed to detect the small Doppler signature in number count fluctuations. We show that radio continuum surveys with the SKA should enable a detection at $gtrsim 3 sigma$ in Phase 2, with marginal detection possible in Phase 1.
Next generation surveys will be capable of determining cosmological parameters beyond percent level. To match this precision, theoretical descriptions should look beyond the linear perturbations to approximate the observables in large scale structure. A quantity of interest is the Number density of galaxies detected by our instruments. This has been focus of interest recently, and several efforts have been made to explain relativistic effects theoretically, thereby testing the full theory. However, the results at nonlinear level from previous works are in disagreement. We present a new and independent approach to computing the relativistic galaxy number counts to second order in cosmological perturbation theory. We derive analytical expressions for the full second order relativistic observed redshift, for the angular diameter distance and for the volume spanned by a survey. Finally, we compare our results with previous works which compute the general distance-redshift relation, finding that our result is in agreement at linear order.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
