Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAn institutional study on plan quality and variation of manual forward planning for Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma
90
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Due to the complexity and cumbersomeness of Gamma Knife (GK) manual forward planning, the quality of the resulting treatment plans heavily depends on the planners skill, experience and the amount of effort devoted to plan development. Hence, GK plan quality may vary significantly among institutions and planners, and even for a same planner at different cases. This is particularly a concern for challenging cases with complicated geometry, such as vestibular schwannoma cases. The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate the plan quality and variation in the manually forward planned, clinically acceptable GK treatment plans of 22 previous vestibular schwannoma cases. Considering the impacts of different patient geometry and different trade-offs among the planning objectives in GK planning, it is difficult to objectively assess the plan quality across different cases. To reduce these confounding factors on plan quality assessment, we employed our recently developed multiresolution-level inverse planning algorithm to generate a golden plan for each case, which is expected to be on or close to the pareto surface with a similar trade-off as used in the manual plan. The plan quality of the manual plan is then quantified in terms of its deviation from the golden plan. A scoring criterion between 0-100 was designed to calculate a final score for each manual plan to simplify our analysis. Large quality variation was observed in these 22 cases, with two cases having a score lower than 75, three cases scoring between 80 and 85, two cases between 85 and 90, eight cases between 90 and 95, and seven cases higher than 95. Inter- and intra- planner variability was also observed in our study. This large variation in GK manual planning deserves high attention, and merits further investigation on how to reduce the variation in GK treatment plan quality.
rate research
Read More
With many variables to adjust, conventional manual forward planning for Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery is very complicated and cumbersome. The resulting plan quality heavily depends on planners skills, experiences and devoted efforts, and varies significantly among cases, planners, and institutions. Quality control for GK planning is desired to consistently provide high-quality plan to each patient. In this study, we proposed a quality control method for GK planning by building a database of high-quality GK plans. Patient anatomy was described by target volume, target shape complexity, and spatial relationship between target and nearby organs, which determine GK planning difficulty level. Plan quality was evaluated using target coverage, selectivity, intermediate dose spillage, maximum dose to 0.1 cc of brainstem, mean dose of ipsilateral cochlea, and beam-on time. When a new plan is created, a high-quality plan that has the most similar target volume size and shape complexity will be identified from the database. A model has also been built to predict the dose to brainstem and cochlea based on their overlap volume histograms. The identified reference plan and the predicted organ dose will help planners to make quality control decisions accordingly. To validate this method, we have built a database for vestibular schwannoma, which are considered to be challenging for GK planning due to the irregularly-shaped target and its proximity to brainstem and cochlea. Five cases were tested, among which one case was considered to be of high quality and four cases had a lower plan quality than prediction. These four cases were replanned and got substantially improved. Our results have demonstrated the efficacy of our proposed quality control method. This method may also be used as a plan quality prediction method to facilitate the development of automatic treatment planning for GK radiosurgery.
Purpose: Several inverse planning algorithms have been developed for Gamma Knife (GK) radiosurgery to determine a large number of plan parameters via solving an optimization problem, which typically consists of multiple objectives. The priorities among these objectives need to be repetitively adjusted to achieve a clinically good plan for each patient. This study aimed to achieve automatic and intelligent priority-tuning, by developing a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based method to model the tuning behaviors of human planners. Methods: We built a priority-tuning policy network using deep convolutional neural networks. Its input was a vector composed of the plan metrics that were used in our institution for GK plan evaluation. The network can determine which tuning action to take, based on the observed quality of the intermediate plan. We trained the network using an end-to-end DRL framework to approximate the optimal action-value function. A scoring function was designed to measure the plan quality. Results: Vestibular schwannoma was chosen as the test bed in this study. The number of training, validation and testing cases were 5, 5, and 16, respectively. For these three datasets, the average plan scores with initial priorities were 3.63 $pm$ 1.34, 3.83 $pm$ 0.86 and 4.20 $pm$ 0.78, respectively, while can be improved to 5.28 $pm$ 0.23, 4.97 $pm$ 0.44 and 5.22 $pm$ 0.26 through manual priority tuning by human expert planners. Our network achieved competitive results with 5.42 $pm$ 0.11, 5.10 $pm$ 0. 42, 5.28 $pm$ 0.20, respectively. Conclusions: Our network can generate GK plans of comparable or slightly higher quality comparing with the plans generated by human planners via manual priority tuning. The network can potentially be incorporated into the clinical workflow to improve GK planning efficiency.
Automatic methods to segment the vestibular schwannoma (VS) tumors and the cochlea from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are critical to VS treatment planning. Although supervised methods have achieved satisfactory performance in VS segmentation, they require full annotations by experts, which is laborious and time-consuming. In this work, we aim to tackle the VS and cochlea segmentation problem in an unsupervised domain adaptation setting. Our proposed method leverages both the image-level domain alignment to minimize the domain divergence and semi-supervised training to further boost the performance. Furthermore, we propose to fuse the labels predicted from multiple models via noisy label correction. Our results on the challenge validation leaderboard showed that our unsupervised method has achieved promising VS and cochlea segmentation performance with mean dice score of 0.8261 $pm$ 0.0416; The mean dice value for the tumor is 0.8302 $pm$ 0.0772. This is comparable to the weakly-supervised based method.
Pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment planning requires planners to make sequential, time consuming interactions with the treatment planning system (TPS) to reach the optimal dose distribution. We seek to develop a reinforcement learning (RL)-based planning bot to systematically address complex tradeoffs and achieve high plan quality consistently and efficiently. The focus of pancreas SBRT planning is finding a balance between organs-at-risk sparing and planning target volume (PTV) coverage. Planners evaluate dose distributions and make planning adjustments to optimize PTV coverage while adhering to OAR dose constraints. We have formulated such interactions between the planner and the TPS into a finite-horizon RL model. First, planning status features are evaluated based on human planner experience and defined as planning states. Second, planning actions are defined to represent steps that planners would commonly implement to address different planning needs. Finally, we have derived a reward system based on an objective function guided by physician-assigned constraints. The planning bot trained itself with 48 plans augmented from 16 previously treated patients and generated plans for 24 cases in a separate validation set. All 24 bot-generated plans achieve similar PTV coverages compared to clinical plans while satisfying all clinical planning constraints. Moreover, the knowledge learned by the bot can be visualized and interpreted as consistent with human planning knowledge, and the knowledge maps learned in separate training sessions are consistent, indicating reproducibility of the learning process.
In a variety of application settings, the user preference for a planning task - the precise optimization objective - is difficult to elicit. One possible remedy is planning as an iterative process, allowing the user to iteratively refine and modify example plans. A key step to support such a process are explanations, answering user questions about the current plan. In particular, a relevant kind of question is Why does the plan you suggest not satisfy $p$?, where p is a plan property desirable to the user. Note that such a question pertains to plan space, i.e., the set of possible alternative plans. Adopting the recent approach to answer such questions in terms of plan-property dependencies, here we implement a tool and user interface for human-guided iterative planning including plan-space explanations. The tool runs in standard Web browsers, and provides simple user interfaces for both developers and users. We conduct a first user study, whose outcome indicates the usefulness of plan-property dependency explanations in iterative planning.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
