Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe first fundamental theorem of invariant theory for the orthosymplectic supergroup
136
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
We give an elementary proof of the first fundamental theorem of the invariant theory for the orthosymplectic supergroup by generalising the method of Atiyah, Bott and Patodi to the supergroup context. We use methods from super-algebraic geometry to convert invariants of the orthosymplectic supergroup into invariants of the corresponding general linear supergroup on a different space. In this way, a super Schur-Weyl-Brauer duality is established between the orthosymplectic supergroup of superdimension $(m|2n)$ and the Brauer algebra with parameter $m-2n$. The result may be interpreted in terms of the relevant Harish-Chandra super pair action (over the complex field), or equivalently, the orthosymplectic Lie supergroup over the infinite dimensional Grassmann algebra. We also state a corresponding theorem for the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra, which involves an extra invariant generator, the super-Pfaffian.
rate research
Read More
We give a complete description of the finite-dimensional irreducible representations of the Yangian associated with the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra $frak{osp}_{1|2}$. The representations are parameterized by monic polynomials in one variable, they are classified in terms of highest weights. We give explicit constructions of a family of elementary modules of the Yangian and show that a wide class of irreducible representations can be produced by taking tensor products of the elementary modules.
We give applications of Foliation Theory to the Classical Invariant Theory of real orthogonal representations, including: The solution of the Inverse Invariant Theory problem for finite groups. An if-and-only-if criterion for when a separating set is a generating set. And the introduction of a class of generalized polarizations which, in the case of representations of finite groups, always generates the algebra of invariants of their diagonal representations.
We determine the Verma multiplicities of standard filtrations of projective modules for integral atypical blocks in the BGG category $mathcal{O}$ for the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras $mathfrak{osp}(3|4)$ by way of translation functors. We then explicitly determine the composition factor multiplicities of Verma modules using BGG reciprocity.
This note is devoted to two classical theorems: the open mapping theorem for analytic functions (OMT) and the fundamental theorem of algebra (FTA). We present a new proof of the first theorem, and then derive the second one by a simple topological argument. The proof is elementary in nature and does not use any kind of integration (neither complex nor real). In addition, it is also independent of the fact that the roots of an analytic function are isolated. The proof is based on either the Banach or Brouwer fixed point theorems. In particular, this shows that one can obtain a proof of the FTA (albeit indirect) which is based on the Brouwer fixed point theorem, an aim which was not reached in the past and later the possibility to achieve it was questioned. We close this note with a simple generalization of the FTA. A short review of certain issues related to the OMT and the FTA is also included.
Suppose we have $n$ different types of self-replicating entity, with the population $P_i$ of the $i$th type changing at a rate equal to $P_i$ times the fitness $f_i$ of that type. Suppose the fitness $f_i$ is any continuous function of all the populations $P_1, dots, P_n$. Let $p_i$ be the fraction of replicators that are of the $i$th type. Then $p = (p_1, dots, p_n)$ is a time-dependent probability distribution, and we prove that its speed as measured by the Fisher information metric equals the variance in fitness. In rough terms, this says that the speed at which information is updated through natural selection equals the variance in fitness. This result can be seen as a modified version of Fishers fundamental theorem of natural selection. We compare it to Fishers original result as interpreted by Price, Ewens and Edwards.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
